-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 296
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🌱 Supervisor flavorgen and templates #2789
🌱 Supervisor flavorgen and templates #2789
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2789 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 64.04% 63.92% -0.12%
==========================================
Files 160 160
Lines 9345 9345
==========================================
- Hits 5985 5974 -11
- Misses 2903 2912 +9
- Partials 457 459 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
WorkerMachineCountVar = "${WORKER_MACHINE_COUNT}" | ||
ControlPlaneEndpointHostVar = "${CONTROL_PLANE_ENDPOINT_IP}" | ||
ControlPlaneEndpointPortVar = "${CONTROL_PLANE_ENDPOINT_PORT:=6443}" | ||
VSphereMachineClassImageVar = "${VSPHERE_IMAGE_NAME}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wondering about what's different from VSPHERE_TEMPLATE
to VSPHERE_IMAGE_NAME
:think:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on my understanding, the first one is an actual VM template (a well defined construct in vCenter), the other is "just a file" in a content library that happens to be an image
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | |||
apiVersion: cluster.x-k8s.io/v1beta1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wondering if we could keep a commons
directory for both (govmomi and supervisor) 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should avoid this optimization at this stage and prefer a clean directory structure.
We can eventually revisit this later when tests are working and possibly already stable
89d44e1
to
a4124e8
Compare
a4124e8
to
9e14d0f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 311e18e5ab05c7e23c538b5270cec1f1356d1681
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: chrischdi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Add supervisor templates to flavor gen and E2E tests