Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ add support for the claim.spec.clusterName property #275

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2024

Conversation

schrej
Copy link
Member

@schrej schrej commented Aug 21, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:
Adds support for the new spec.clusterName of IPAddressClaims that was introduced with CAPI 1.8. It is respected when checking whether the referenced Cluster is paused. The label is also still supported.

I've added an index for claims that gets filled with either the property or the label's value to make it easier to react to cluster unpausing.

Also contains a few dependency upgrades, including CAPI 1.8.1

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #258

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Aug 21, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 21, 2024
@schrej schrej force-pushed the feature/claim-clustername-property branch from 4347dee to 5e2ca61 Compare August 22, 2024 10:19
internal/controllers/ipaddressclaim_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/controllers/ipaddressclaim_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
},
))
if err != nil {
if err := r.Client.List(context.Background(), claims, client.MatchingFields{"clusterName": a.GetName()}); err != nil {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does this also index the ClusterNameLabel ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it prefers the field but indexes both.

pkg/ipamutil/reconciler.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 9, 2024
@schrej schrej force-pushed the feature/claim-clustername-property branch from 5e2ca61 to 5eb8536 Compare September 10, 2024 09:09
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 10, 2024
@mcbenjemaa
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 10, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mcbenjemaa, schrej

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 999c61b into main Sep 10, 2024
5 checks passed
@schrej schrej deleted the feature/claim-clustername-property branch September 11, 2024 07:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support for IPAddressClaim spec.clusterName once CAPI 1.8 is released
3 participants