Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add readiness probe so controller does not report "Ready" prematurely #751

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 2, 2021

Conversation

vdhanan
Copy link
Contributor

@vdhanan vdhanan commented Feb 18, 2021

Is this a bug fix or adding new feature?
Fixes #548

What is this PR about? / Why do we need it?
This change reuses the liveness probe endpoint for a readiness probe, so that the csi controller's status can be reported accurately. Currently, if the ec2 instance metadata is unavailable, the csi controller deployment reports as ready, tries to fetch the metadata, panics when it cannot, and then stops reporting as ready. With this change, the controller deployment will not report ready from the get-go, and as a result will not report an inaccurate status if the instance metadata is unavailable.

What testing is done?
Manually tested this using both kubectl and helm. Applied a global network policy to block access to the ec2 instance metadata, then created an ebs csi driver deployment. Visually confirmed with kubectl get deployments -n kube-system that the behavior changed and the controller no longer reported as ready before entering the CrashLoopBackOff state.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 18, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @vdhanan!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Feb 18, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @vdhanan. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 18, 2021
@vdhanan
Copy link
Contributor Author

vdhanan commented Feb 18, 2021

signed CLA

@ayberk
Copy link
Contributor

ayberk commented Feb 18, 2021

@vdhanan looks like github can't associate your commits with your account. You can squash your commits into one and then use git commit --amend --author="Author Name <email@address.com>" to fix it. Email should be one of the emails you have on your github account.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 18, 2021

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1662

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 81.712%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1657: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1747
Relevant Lines: 2138

💛 - Coveralls

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Feb 18, 2021
@vdhanan
Copy link
Contributor Author

vdhanan commented Feb 18, 2021

@ayberk thanks, i think i fixed it.

@ayberk
Copy link
Contributor

ayberk commented Feb 19, 2021

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Feb 19, 2021
@@ -91,6 +91,14 @@ spec:
timeoutSeconds: 3
periodSeconds: 10
failureThreshold: 5
readinessProbe:
Copy link
Contributor

@AndyXiangLi AndyXiangLi Feb 19, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to update node.yaml as node service is calling metadata service on initialization?
https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/aws-ebs-csi-driver/blob/master/pkg/driver/node.go#L86

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried creating a ebs-csi-node DaemonSet with a GlobalNetworkPolicy blocking metadata access, and it indeed reported as Ready, when it probably shouldn't. However, even after adding a readinessProbe in node.yaml, the node service still reported as Ready. Not sure how to fix that issue -- if it even is an issue -- so I'll defer it for now.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 20, 2021
@vdhanan
Copy link
Contributor Author

vdhanan commented Feb 23, 2021

@ayberk can you please review this CR when you get a chance?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 23, 2021
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ apiVersion: v1
appVersion: "0.9.0"
name: aws-ebs-csi-driver
description: A Helm chart for AWS EBS CSI Driver
version: 0.9.9
version: 0.10.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the confusion. You need to bump the patch and keep minor version the same, ie, 0.9.x.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

got it

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Feb 26, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Feb 26, 2021
@vdhanan
Copy link
Contributor Author

vdhanan commented Mar 1, 2021

run tests

@ayberk
Copy link
Contributor

ayberk commented Mar 1, 2021

/retest

@vdhanan
Copy link
Contributor Author

vdhanan commented Mar 1, 2021

rebuild

@ayberk
Copy link
Contributor

ayberk commented Mar 1, 2021

/test continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ayberk: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger jobs:

  • /test pull-aws-ebs-csi-driver-verify
  • /test pull-aws-ebs-csi-driver-unit
  • /test pull-aws-ebs-csi-driver-e2e-single-az
  • /test pull-aws-ebs-csi-driver-e2e-multi-az
  • /test pull-aws-ebs-csi-driver-migration-test-latest
  • /test pull-aws-ebs-csi-driver-external-test-latest

Use /test all to run the following jobs:

  • pull-aws-ebs-csi-driver-verify
  • pull-aws-ebs-csi-driver-unit
  • pull-aws-ebs-csi-driver-e2e-single-az
  • pull-aws-ebs-csi-driver-e2e-multi-az
  • pull-aws-ebs-csi-driver-migration-test-latest

In response to this:

/test continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ayberk
Copy link
Contributor

ayberk commented Mar 1, 2021

Ok makes sense bot is not responsible for this. We can merge this manually.

@vdhanan
Copy link
Contributor Author

vdhanan commented Mar 1, 2021

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Mar 1, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Mar 1, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Mar 1, 2021
@vdhanan
Copy link
Contributor Author

vdhanan commented Mar 2, 2021

/test pull-aws-ebs-csi-driver-migration-test-latest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Mar 2, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Mar 2, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Mar 2, 2021
@ayberk
Copy link
Contributor

ayberk commented Mar 2, 2021

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 2, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ayberk, vdhanan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 2, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit c07e654 into kubernetes-sigs:master Mar 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Controller reports as ready even though it is not able to connect to EC2 instance metadata
5 participants