Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SDK/DSL-Compiler - Expand placeholders in command #637

Conversation

Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

@Ark-kun Ark-kun commented Jan 5, 2019

Allows using passed arguments in command.


This change is Reviewable

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To fully approve this pull request, please assign additional approvers.
We suggest the following additional approver: ark-kun

If they are not already assigned, you can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @ark-kun in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Jan 5, 2019

/assign @qimingj

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Ark-kun: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
kubeflow-pipeline-e2e-test 4aaf00f link /test kubeflow-pipeline-e2e-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ark-kun commented Jan 5, 2019

There is a similar PR #623 Closing this one

@Ark-kun Ark-kun closed this Jan 5, 2019
Linchin pushed a commit to Linchin/pipelines that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
…eflow#637)

* We should no longer need to use self signed ceritificates with auto-deployed instances because
GKE ManagedCertificates don't have the SSL quota limits of lets encrypt.

* Nonethless fix a bug in the logic for attaching a self signed ceritificate.
  * We need to delete the managed certificate annotations otherwise
    the ingress doesn't end up using the self signed ceritifcate and
    we end up running out of SSL quota.

* Creating a playbook directory and start putting the playbooks there.

* Related to kubeflow/testing#636

* Don't use self-signed certificates in auto deployments.
  Lets Encrypt quota should no longer be an issue so always use
  ManagedCertificates
Linchin pushed a commit to Linchin/pipelines that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
…ces (kubeflow#637)" (kubeflow#642)

Partial revert of commit afd9f95.

The change in the self-signed logic breaks presubmits with the following error

E           kubernetes.client.rest.ApiException: (409)
E           Reason: Conflict
E           HTTP response headers: HTTPHeaderDict({'Audit-Id': '85305103-054e-4795-a45e-f802de1ae4ea', 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'Date': 'Wed, 15 Apr 2020 00:31:03 GMT', 'Content-Length': '352'})
E           HTTP response body: {"kind":"Status","apiVersion":"v1","metadata":{},"status":"Failure","message":"Operation cannot be fulfilled on ingresses.extensions \"envoy-ingress\": the object has been modified; please apply your changes to the latest version and try again","reason":"Conflict","details":{"name":"envoy-ingress","group":"extensions","kind":"ingresses"},"code":409}

* Only changes to util.py in the original PR are reverted.
magdalenakuhn17 pushed a commit to magdalenakuhn17/pipelines that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2023
…ble (kubeflow#637)

* Allow tornado num of workers configurable

* Add parallelism field

* Add parallelism tests

* Add num worker tests

* Use model server arg constants

* Validate parallelism

* Update parallelism field comment
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants