-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support filtering on storage state #629
Conversation
/lgtm |
backend/src/apiserver/model/run.go
Outdated
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ var runAPIToModelFieldMap = map[string]string{ | |||
"created_at": "CreatedAtInSec", | |||
"description": "Description", | |||
"scheduled_at": "ScheduledAtInSec", | |||
"storage_state": "StorageState", | |||
"storageState": "StorageState", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's use storage_state here, and fix the case in the proto name instead. It's more consistent, and in line with the style guide for proto field naming.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should, but I'm kind of blocked on your bazel changes since I can't re-generate the client libs with the changes. If you think we'll land that change soon, we can block this PR on it. Otherwise, let's get this merged and refactor it separately?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh yeah good point. I think the Bazel change is good to go.
@IronPan do you think you can get to that change soon? If not, maybe let's submit this first and change names later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO we desperately need #631.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry I was not review the bazel PR on time because I am not on the reviewer list.
In most of the time I only review the PR that assigned to me. I'll review it now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correction not on the assignee list
/lgtm |
do we still need this change? |
This change is needed, but will be updated with the right snake case when the bazel change is merged, since I'll need to rebuild the client libs and push them in this PR too. |
SGTM |
1588347
to
2a5d1ce
Compare
5419622
to
b8c7c47
Compare
2ef9b22
to
7052cdb
Compare
Rebased to pick up other fixes, PTAL. |
/lgtm |
/test kubeflow-pipeline-e2e-test |
1 similar comment
/test kubeflow-pipeline-e2e-test |
bcc1e5b
to
7be3712
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/area back-end
/assign @neuromage @IronPan
This change is