Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ui): Fixes V1 Run detail unnecessary reloading. Fixes #10590 #11214

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2024

Conversation

quinnovator
Copy link
Contributor

@quinnovator quinnovator commented Sep 15, 2024

Description of your changes:
This PR addresses #10590. V1 Run details were unexpectedly reloading when users navigated away from the page.

This is because the loading state is derived from a query that happens in RunDetailsRouter.tsx, which then determines whether to show the loading message or RunDetails.tsx. When the loading state occurs, the RunDetails component is unmounted because of this condition.

To address this issue, I have established a prop for EnhancedRunDetails called isLoading. This prop is derived from the same query as before, but the condition is now leveraged within the render method of the RunDetails component itself, therefore preventing the component from unmounting.

Checklist:

Signed-off-by: Jack Quinn <jack@jq.codes>
Copy link

Hi @quinnovator. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubeflow member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@quinnovator
Copy link
Contributor Author

CC: @droctothorpe

@droctothorpe
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

Copy link
Member

@chensun chensun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chensun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot merged commit eee095e into kubeflow:master Sep 16, 2024
9 checks passed
sefgsefg pushed a commit to sefgsefg/pipelines that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
 (kubeflow#11214)

Signed-off-by: Jack Quinn <jack@jq.codes>
Signed-off-by: sefgsefg <sefgsefg@gmail.com>
sefgsefg pushed a commit to sefgsefg/pipelines that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
 (kubeflow#11214)

Signed-off-by: Jack Quinn <jack@jq.codes>
Signed-off-by: sefgsefg <sefgsefg@gmail.com>
R3hankhan123 pushed a commit to R3hankhan123/pipelines that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2024
sefgsefg pushed a commit to sefgsefg/pipelines that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2024
zed546213 pushed a commit to zed546213/pipelines that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2024
 (kubeflow#11214)

Signed-off-by: Jack Quinn <jack@jq.codes>
Signed-off-by: zed546213 <zed546213@gmail.com>
chris454656 pushed a commit to chris454656/pipelines that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
 (kubeflow#11214)

Signed-off-by: Jack Quinn <jack@jq.codes>
Signed-off-by: chris <chris20120826@gmail.com>
boarder7395 pushed a commit to boarder7395/pipelines that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants