ARM version

[ind3x]

Hi,

Actually I have been porting official Docker images for Elasticsearch, Logstash and Kibana to Raspberry with the intention of having a RPi version similar to officials ones.

Due to this reason I forked the repository with de purpouse of bulding a ARM (tested on RPi 2, ARMv7) version of Tini (https://github.com/ind3x/rpi-tini).

Would you mind to build and ARM version? I think that could be such a good idea to have option.

Kind regards!

[krallin]

Thanks; it's not the first time the issue of cross-compiling comes up (see: #30). I'll take another look.

Thanks!

[ind3x]

Thanks!

I read that issue before write this. But I was thinking that could be good idea to comment that there is a workaround until a official solution.

Kind regards!

[schwab]

Is there anyway to get this working on a Raspberry PI? I don't mind a work around, but it appears this issue has been abandoned. What needs to be done still to get the ARM compile done?

[krallin]

@schwab:

This issue is about providing pre built binaries for ARM, which is a build system issue - I need to cross compile for ARM, but testing the resulting binary is the harder part.

However, Tini compiles as-is for ARM, there's no extra work to do on that front. You have two options to use it on a Pi:

• Use a distribution that packages Tini and install from a package. Alpine Linux for example has ARM Tini packages.

• Compile Tini yourself. You'll need Cmake, xxd, and a C compiler. Instructions are in the README.

  Cheers,

[ind3x]

@schwab

Also, if you prefer, you can use my compilation that I share in my repo https://github.com/ind3x/rpi-tini.

It has been tested in a Raspberry Pi 2.

[KurtStam]

@krallin It'd be great if cross compilation can be added for arm64. For now I'm building and releasing them here https://github.com/Project31/tini. I have a jenkins instance on arm64, so if you want to setup some automated testing then please let me know.

[Valantin]

hi, I'm start to port Dockerfile to armhf devices https://github.com/Valantin/rpimage based on armhf semiofficial image https://hub.docker.com/r/armhf/.

I'm intrested to a cross-compiled version of tini in the official repository

[krallin]

Hey everyone here, I have some good news: official ARM builds of Tini 😄

Please this give this latest pre-release a shot: https://github.com/krallin/tini/releases/tag/v0.11.0.pre1.

These are cross-builds, so while I've tested them myself on VMs, I'm interested in hearing a bit of feedback from ARM users before I merge those into an official release :)

I still have a little fix to do in #54, but this is pretty close.

Thanks for your patience!

Cheers,

[KurtStam]

Great :). I'm traveling now but will give it a go later this week. Thx!
--Kurt

[ind3x]

Great news!! I'm going to test it this days in my projects for being sure that works fine in my RPi 2.

[krallin]

Awesome; thanks for giving it a shot. Note that if you're on a RPI, the binary you want is the armhf one (as opposed to the arm64 one).

Cheers,

[ind3x]

Yes! I let you know about result and also, in case of working fine, I will deprecate mi forked repository.

[ind3x]

Hi again! I tested following the most common configuration:

ENV TINI_VERSION 0.11.0.pre1
RUN set -x \
    && apt-get update && apt-get install -y ca-certificates curl \
        --no-install-recommends \
    && curl -fSL "https://github.com/krallin/tini/releases/download/v${TINI_VERSION}/tini-armhf" -o /usr/local/bin/tini \
    && curl -fSL "https://github.com/krallin/tini/releases/download/v${TINI_VERSION}/tini-armhf.asc" -o /usr/local/bin/tini.asc \
    && export GNUPGHOME="$(mktemp -d)" \
    && gpg --keyserver ha.pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys 6380DC428747F6C393FEACA59A84159D7001A4E5 \
    && gpg --batch --verify /usr/local/bin/tini.asc /usr/local/bin/tini \
    && rm -r "$GNUPGHOME" /usr/local/bin/tini.asc \
    && chmod +x /usr/local/bin/tini \
    && tini -h \
    && apt-get purge --auto-remove -y ca-certificates curl \
    && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*

and seems like it works fine.

As an anotation, when I execute tini -h the output prints tini (version 0.10.0 - git.271c097) instead of version 0.11.0.

+ tini -h
tini (version 0.10.0 - git.271c097)
Usage: tini [OPTIONS] PROGRAM -- [ARGS]

Execute a program under the supervision of a valid init process (tini)

  -h: Show this help message and exit.
  -s: Register as a process subreaper (requires Linux >= 3.4).
  -v: Generate more verbose output. Repeat up to 3 times.
  -g: Send signals to the child's process group.
  -l: Show license and exit.

[krallin]

Perfect, thanks for testing.

It's expected that the version reports a lower number since I have not
actually bumped it yet! :)

On Monday, 31 October 2016, Imanol Urra notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi again! I tested following the most common configuration:
ENV TINI_VERSION 0.11.0.pre1
RUN set -x
&& apt-get update && apt-get install -y ca-certificates curl vim
--no-install-recommends
&& curl -fSL "https://github.com/krallin/tini/releases/download/v${
TINI_VERSION}/tini-armhf" -o /usr/local/bin/tini
&& curl -fSL "https://github.com/krallin/tini/releases/download/v${
TINI_VERSION}/tini-armhf.asc" -o /usr/local/bin/tini.asc
&& export GNUPGHOME="$(mktemp -d)"
&& gpg --keyserver ha.pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys
6380DC428747F6C393FEACA59A84159D7001A4E5
&& gpg --batch --verify /usr/local/bin/tini.asc /usr/local/bin/tini
&& rm -r "$GNUPGHOME" /usr/local/bin/tini.asc
&& chmod +x /usr/local/bin/tini
&& tini -h
&& apt-get purge --auto-remove -y ca-certificates curl
&& rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*

and seems like it works fine.

As an anotation, when I execute tini -h the output prints tini
(version 0.10.0 - git.271c097) instead of version 0.11.0
`+ tini -h
tini (version 0.10.0 - git.271c097)
Usage: tini [OPTIONS] PROGRAM -- [ARGS]

Execute a program under the supervision of a valid init process (tini)

-h: Show this help message and exit.
-s: Register as a process subreaper (requires Linux >= 3.4).
-v: Generate more verbose output. Repeat up to 3 times.
-g: Send signals to the child's process group.
-l: Show license and exit.`

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#51 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABqD1oXKdl6IMoLxs_Iqfw2DICIAvv5Cks5q5js8gaJpZM4J79iO
.

[krallin]

I just released Tini 0.11.0, which now includes ARM builds! 😄

Let me know if you run into any trouble of course.

Cheers,

[ind3x]

Hi @krallin, just for notify, I've deprecated the forked repo I created a month ago in favor of yours 😄.

[krallin]

Sounds good; thanks @ind3x

[KurtStam]

All looks good on arm64 too. Cheers! --Kurt

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Kurt Stam kstam@redhat.com wrote:

Great :). I'm traveling now but will give it a go later this week. Thx!
--Kurt

On Oct 30, 2016, at 08:06, Thomas Orozco notifications@github.com wrote:

Hey everyone here, I have some good news: official ARM builds of Tini 😄

Please this give this latest pre-release a shot:
https://github.com/krallin/tini/releases/tag/v0.11.0.pre1.

These are cross-builds, so while I've tested them myself on VMs, I'm
interested in hearing a bit of feedback from ARM users before I merge those
into an official release :)

I still have a little fix to do in #54
#54, but this is pretty close.

Thanks for your patience!

Cheers,

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#51 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACK-D5ByubxsEobaZGor7ulagBiCvpPks5q5LJlgaJpZM4J79iO
.

Kurt T. Stam

twitter: @KurtStam
google+: kurt.stam@gmail.com