Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Redis Cache new modules #280

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

GoodforGod
Copy link
Contributor

  • Redis cache new modules (cache-redis-lettuce & cache-redis-jedis) introduced as replacement for old one cache-redis module
  • Separate Redis connection modules added (redis-lettuce & redis-jedis)
  • Old Redis cache-redis module now in support only mode, it is deprecated, but still present for compatibility and will be removed in future versions
  • Compatibility for old module added on both module and annotation processing levels

@GoodforGod GoodforGod added new module Feature where new module is added module: cache Related to Cache module labels Mar 11, 2025
@GoodforGod GoodforGod added this to the v1.2.0 milestone Mar 11, 2025
@GoodforGod GoodforGod requested a review from Squiry March 11, 2025 07:28
Cache Redis module refactored and new replacement for old Redis cache module introduced
Old Redis Cache module deprecated but not removed for compatibility
JedisCacheStubAsyncClient for fake async client added
JedisCacheAsyncClient uses user provided executor for async operations
@GoodforGod GoodforGod force-pushed the feature/cache-redis-multi-impl branch from ea1082a to e95a77f Compare March 11, 2025 07:29
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 11, 2025

Test Results

838 tests   834 ✅  9m 0s ⏱️
104 suites    4 💤
104 files      0 ❌

Results for commit a140916.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
module: cache Related to Cache module new module Feature where new module is added
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant