Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 : Fix support for python and nodejs. #401

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jortel
Copy link
Contributor

@jortel jortel commented Feb 7, 2025

Refactor generic provider into separate python and nodejs extensions with correct metadata.

closes #399

requires:

Signed-off-by: Jeff Ortel <jortel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Ortel <jortel@redhat.com>
@@ -181,7 +190,7 @@ provider_java_container_requests_cpu: "1"
provider_java_container_requests_memory: "2Gi"
provider_java_image_fqin: "{{ lookup('env', 'RELATED_IMAGE_PROVIDER_JAVA') }}"
provider_java_name: "java"
provider_java_service_name: "{{ app_name }}-{{ provider_java_name }}-{{ analyzer_component_name }}"
provider_java_service_name: "{{ app_name }}-{{ provider_java_name }}-{{ provider_java_component_name }}"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hint: Fixing what seems to be a cut-n-paste error.

@@ -512,11 +512,21 @@
name: "{{ admin_name }}"
namespace: "{{ app_namespace }}"

- name: "Create Windup Addon CR"
- name: "Create Analyzer Addon CR"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hint: More accurate name.

@jortel jortel requested a review from jmontleon February 7, 2025 15:33
Copy link
Member

@jmontleon jmontleon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@aufi
Copy link
Member

aufi commented Feb 10, 2025

Looks good with one question, I understood we want add "dedicated" python and nodejs providers, but I'm missing why we want delete the generic provider (not a bloker, I'm likely missing some background discussions/requirements, just wanted to mention it).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

🐛 The generic extension need to be split into separate provider extensions.
3 participants