handeling the provider not respecting scope by adding Filter in engine

Signed-off-by: Shawn Hurley <shawn@hurley.page>

engine/engine.go

@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ func (r *ruleEngine) RunRulesScoped(ctx context.Context, ruleSets []RuleSet, sco
 
 	taggingRules, otherRules, mapRuleSets := r.filterRules(ruleSets, selectors...)
 
-	ruleContext := r.runTaggingRules(ctx, taggingRules, mapRuleSets, conditionContext)
+	ruleContext := r.runTaggingRules(ctx, taggingRules, mapRuleSets, conditionContext, scopes)
 
 	// Need a better name for this thing
 	ret := make(chan response)
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ func (r *ruleEngine) RunRulesScoped(ctx context.Context, ruleSets []RuleSet, sco
 							rs.Errors[response.Rule.RuleID] = response.Err.Error()
 						}
 					} else if response.ConditionResponse.Matched && len(response.ConditionResponse.Incidents) > 0 {
-						violation, err := r.createViolation(ctx, response.ConditionResponse, response.Rule)
+						violation, err := r.createViolation(ctx, response.ConditionResponse, response.Rule, scopes)
 						if err != nil {
 							r.logger.Error(err, "unable to create violation from response", "ruleID", response.Rule.RuleID)
 						}
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ func (r *ruleEngine) filterRules(ruleSets []RuleSet, selectors ...RuleSelector)
 
 // runTaggingRules filters and runs info rules synchronously
 // returns list of non-info rules, a context to pass to them
-func (r *ruleEngine) runTaggingRules(ctx context.Context, infoRules []ruleMessage, mapRuleSets map[string]*konveyor.RuleSet, context ConditionContext) ConditionContext {
+func (r *ruleEngine) runTaggingRules(ctx context.Context, infoRules []ruleMessage, mapRuleSets map[string]*konveyor.RuleSet, context ConditionContext, scope Scope) ConditionContext {
 	// track unique tags per ruleset
 	rulesetTagsCache := map[string]map[string]bool{}
 	for _, ruleMessage := range infoRules {
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ func (r *ruleEngine) runTaggingRules(ctx context.Context, infoRules []ruleMessag
 				mapRuleSets[ruleMessage.ruleSetName] = rs
 			}
 			// create an insight for this tag
-			violation, err := r.createViolation(ctx, response, rule)
+			violation, err := r.createViolation(ctx, response, rule, scope)
 			if err != nil {
 				r.logger.Error(err, "unable to create violation from response", "ruleID", rule.RuleID)
 			}
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ func (r *ruleEngine) getRelativePathForViolation(fileURI uri.URI) (uri.URI, erro
 	return fileURI, nil
 }
 
-func (r *ruleEngine) createViolation(ctx context.Context, conditionResponse ConditionResponse, rule Rule) (konveyor.Violation, error) {
+func (r *ruleEngine) createViolation(ctx context.Context, conditionResponse ConditionResponse, rule Rule, scope Scope) (konveyor.Violation, error) {
 	incidents := []konveyor.Incident{}
 	fileCodeSnipCount := map[string]int{}
 	incidentsSet := map[string]struct{}{} // Set of incidents
@@ -504,6 +504,11 @@ func (r *ruleEngine) createViolation(ctx context.Context, conditionResponse Cond
 		if r.incidentLimit != 0 && len(incidents) == r.incidentLimit {
 			break
 		}
+		// If we should remove the incident because the provider didn't filter it
+		// and the user asked for a certain scope of incidents.
+		if scope != nil && scope.FilterResponse(m) {
+			continue
+		}
 		trimmedUri, err := r.getRelativePathForViolation(m.FileURI)
 		if err != nil {
 			return konveyor.Violation{}, err

engine/scopes.go

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ type Scope interface {
 	// For now this is the only place that we are considering adding a scope
 	// in the future, we could scope other things
 	AddToContext(*ConditionContext) error
+	FilterResponse(IncidentContext) bool
 }
 
 type scopeWrapper struct {
@@ -35,15 +36,25 @@ func (s *scopeWrapper) Name() string {
 }
 
 func (s *scopeWrapper) AddToContext(conditionCTX *ConditionContext) error {
-	for _, s := range s.scopes {
-		err := s.AddToContext(conditionCTX)
+	for _, scope := range s.scopes {
+		err := scope.AddToContext(conditionCTX)
 		if err != nil {
 			return err
 		}
 	}
 	return nil
 }
 
+func (s *scopeWrapper) FilterResponse(response IncidentContext) bool {
+	for _, scope := range s.scopes {
+		shouldFilter := scope.FilterResponse(response)
+		if shouldFilter {
+			return true
+		}
+	}
+	return false
+}
+
 var _ Scope = &scopeWrapper{}
 
 func NewScope(scopes ...Scope) Scope {
@@ -80,6 +91,15 @@ func (i *includedPathScope) AddToContext(conditionCTX *ConditionContext) error {
 
 }
 
+func (i *includedPathScope) FilterResponse(response IncidentContext) bool {
+	for _, path := range i.paths {
+		if string(response.FileURI) != "" && response.FileURI.Filename() == path {
+			return false
+		}
+	}
+	return true
+}
+
 func IncludedPathsScope(paths []string, log logr.Logger) Scope {
 	return &includedPathScope{
 		paths: paths,