-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 592
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix mt-broker-ingress watch Broker #7499
Conversation
Signed-off-by: pingjiang <xiangpingjiang1998@gmail.com>
Hi @xiangpingjiang. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a knative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #7499 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 76.12% 76.12%
=======================================
Files 260 260
Lines 14467 14467
=======================================
Hits 11013 11013
Misses 2888 2888
Partials 566 566 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
/ok-to-test |
/test reconciler-tests |
1 similar comment
/test reconciler-tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @xiangpingjiang sorry I missed this earlier when investigating the issue! It seems like when the brokers are first created sometimes the Address
field is nil
in the status, causing the ingress to panic. I added a suggestion for a fix to this, as well as checking that the broker itself is not nil
just for safety.
/cherry-pick release-1.12 |
@Cali0707: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.12 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-1.11 |
@Cali0707: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.11 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for fixing this @xiangpingjiang !
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Cali0707, xiangpingjiang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@Cali0707: new pull request created: #7512 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@Cali0707: new pull request created: #7513 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Fixes #7474
Proposed Changes
Pre-review Checklist
Release Note
Docs