Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ApiServerSource serve v1alpha2 #2872

Merged

Conversation

n3wscott
Copy link
Contributor

@n3wscott n3wscott commented Mar 30, 2020

There is a very big API change between APIServerSource v1alpha1 and v1alpha2. Because of this we are removing the implementation of v1alpha1 and only use v1alpha2. Conversion between v1alpha1 and v1alpha2 is lossy so we are going to still store at v1alpha1, but the deprecated fields in v1alpha1 are ignored.

Proposed Changes

  • Serve APIServerSource v1alpha2.
  • Only reconcile APIServerSource as v1alpha2 resources.
  • Apply Adapter v2 to APIServerSource Receive Adapter.

Release Note

- Adding APIServerSource v1alpha2, APIServerSource is reconciled and realized only in the v1alpha2 API, some fields are now ignored, please use v1alpha2.

Docs

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 30, 2020
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. label Mar 30, 2020
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 30, 2020
@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: n3wscott

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 30, 2020
Copy link
Member

@mattmoor mattmoor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Produced via:
gofmt -s -w $(find -path './vendor' -prune -o -path './third_party' -prune -o -type f -name '*.go' -print)

Copy link
Member

@mattmoor mattmoor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Produced via:
gofmt -s -w $(find -path './vendor' -prune -o -path './third_party' -prune -o -type f -name '*.go' -print)

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the area/test-and-release Test infrastructure, tests or release label Mar 31, 2020
Copy link
Member

@mattmoor mattmoor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Produced via:
gofmt -s -w $(find -path './vendor' -prune -o -path './third_party' -prune -o -type f -name '*.go' -print)

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 31, 2020
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 1, 2020
@@ -132,8 +126,6 @@ type ApiServerResource struct {

// LabelSelector restricts this source to objects with the selected labels
// More info: http://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/overview/working-with-objects/labels/#label-selectors
// Deprecated: Per-resource label selectors will no longer be supported in
// v1alpha2, please use Spec.LabelSelector.
LabelSelector metav1.LabelSelector `json:"labelSelector"`

// ControllerSelector restricts this source to objects with a controlling owner reference of the specified kind.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with removing ControllerSelector (redundant). Not so sure about deprecating Controller as it has a real use case. k8s sample controller does it sightly differently (see https://github.com/kubernetes/sample-controller/blob/041853156b367ba768df5cda747e653dd98a7127/controller.go#L370) by getting the controlling owner and filtering by GVK.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am filtering by gvk, but the owner gvk comes from spec. If you need both resources that are owned and unowned, it would be two resources.

I think next pass is to mt the source in a namespace for the same service account.

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 1, 2020
Copy link
Member

@mattmoor mattmoor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Produced via:
gofmt -s -w $(find -path './vendor' -prune -o -path './third_party' -prune -o -type f -name '*.go' -print)

@n3wscott
Copy link
Contributor Author

n3wscott commented Apr 1, 2020

/hold

no selector on the Owner... fixing.

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 1, 2020
Copy link
Member

@mattmoor mattmoor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Produced via:
gofmt -s -w $(find -path './vendor' -prune -o -path './third_party' -prune -o -type f -name '*.go' -print)

@n3wscott
Copy link
Contributor Author

n3wscott commented Apr 1, 2020

selector is gone from owner GVK and panics are removed.

/unhold

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 1, 2020
Copy link
Member

@mattmoor mattmoor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Produced via:
gofmt -s -w $(find -path './vendor' -prune -o -path './third_party' -prune -o -type f -name '*.go' -print)

Copy link
Member

@mattmoor mattmoor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Produced via:
gofmt -s -w $(find -path './vendor' -prune -o -path './third_party' -prune -o -type f -name '*.go' -print)

@@ -18,74 +18,52 @@ package resources

import (
"fmt"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Format Go code:

Suggested change
"fmt"
"fmt"
"testing"

@@ -18,74 +18,52 @@ package resources

import (
"fmt"
"knative.dev/pkg/kmeta"
"testing"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Format Go code:

Suggested change
"testing"

@knative-metrics-robot
Copy link

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-knative-eventing-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/adapter/apiserver/adapter.go 77.0% 76.9% -0.1
pkg/adapter/apiserver/adapter_injection.go Do not exist 76.9%
pkg/adapter/apiserver/delegate.go Do not exist 88.9%
pkg/adapter/apiserver/events/events.go 95.2% 95.7% 0.5
pkg/adapter/apiserver/filter.go Do not exist 66.7%
pkg/apis/sources/v1alpha1/apiserver_conversion.go 92.2% 96.2% 4.0
pkg/reconciler/apiserversource/apiserversource.go 84.2% 75.2% -9.0
pkg/reconciler/apiserversource/resources/receive_adapter.go 100.0% 83.3% -16.7

@@ -79,5 +79,5 @@ spec:
served: true
storage: true
- name: v1alpha2
served: false
served: true
storage: false
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm confused between this and the comments. Shouldn't this be flipped to storage = true?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is stored as v1alpha1 still.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is lossy so I think we have to do that manual upgrade touch thing. So I am leaving it as v1alpha1 stored until we fix this issue as a whole

@lionelvillard
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

The missing controller filter can always be added later if needed.

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 1, 2020
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot merged commit 62e741c into knative:master Apr 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/test-and-release Test infrastructure, tests or release cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants