-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CIP-116 | Add feedback from query layer standardisation workshop #2 #3
CIP-116 | Add feedback from query layer standardisation workshop #2 #3
Conversation
Ryun1
commented
Mar 6, 2024
•
edited
Loading
edited
- small tidy/ corrections
- added "versioning" guidance
- added a changelog to be maintained
- fleshed out rationale
3cf4ccb
to
f127bf9
Compare
|
||
### Acceptance Criteria | ||
|
||
- [ ] One future ledger era schema is added | ||
- [ ] This standard is implemented within three separate tools, libraries, etc. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why three? Is this from some more general CIP guideline?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Feel free to change, I feel like it is a fair number, there is no official guidelines it is up to the author
described here
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Kalnitsky <klntsky@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Kalnitsky <klntsky@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Kalnitsky <klntsky@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Kalnitsky <klntsky@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Kalnitsky <klntsky@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Kalnitsky <klntsky@gmail.com>