Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade egg-logger from 2.6.2 to 2.9.1 #31

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

khronosleung
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade egg-logger from 2.6.2 to 2.9.1.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 5 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released a year ago, on 2022-11-15.
Release notes
Package name: egg-logger
  • 2.9.1 - 2022-11-15
  • 2.9.0 - 2022-07-27
  • 2.8.0 - 2022-03-22
  • 2.7.1 - 2021-12-30
  • 2.7.0 - 2021-12-05
  • 2.6.2 - 2021-08-02
from egg-logger GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: egg-logger
  • 951fab3 Release 2.9.1
  • ec97edd 🐛 FIX: Ignore error log after stream close on unittest env (#79)
  • 31a07e3 Release 2.9.0
  • 493a595 feat: support custom concentrateLoggerName options (#78)
  • f5acb3d Release 2.8.0
  • 6f7dcbb feat: Only output logs in JSON file format is supported (#77)
  • 41497a6 Release 2.7.1
  • fe93575 fix: EggLoggers constructor typing (#75)
  • 3e4994c Release 2.7.0
  • f42cb95 feat: support performance timer for more precise milliseconds (#74)

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants