Skip to content

Supplementary material for BSSA Manuscript in Preparation about evaluating UCERF3-ETAS Simulations during the Ridgecrest sequence

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

khawajasim/ridgecrest_evaluation_bssa

 
 

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

57 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Table of Contents

  1. Comprehensive Evaluations
    1. Cumulative N-Test Result
    2. Cumulative M-Test Result
    3. Cumulative L-Test Result
    4. Cumulative S-Test Result
    5. Cumulative IEDD-Test Result
    6. Cumulative IETD-Test Result
    7. Cumulative PROB-Test Result
    8. Cumulative TERD-Test Result
    9. Cumulative BV-Test Result

Comprehensive Evaluations

The following plots compare U3ETAS forecasts with the NoFaults version for about ten weeks of forecasts following the Ridgecrest sequence. For each test considered we will compare the results against the quantiles from a uniform distribution under the assumption that the p-values from independent samples of the test distribution are uniformly distributed. We also plot the p-values for each simulation in time to observe possible temporal trends.

Target events with M2.5+ are collected for seven days following the origin time of the forecast. Events are selected only if they occur within three fault radii from the epicenter of the mainshock of the sequence. We apply the Mc(t) model from Helmstetter et al., to account for catalog incompleteness during the sequence.

Cumulative N-Test Result

(Left) Evaluation p-values compared against uniform distribution quantiles. If observations are consistent with the test-distribution (assuming the forecast is true) the quantile scores should follow an exponential distribution. (Right) Quantile scores plotted progressively during the Ridgecrest sequence. The shaded gray regions indicate critical regions assuming α = 5%.

Cumulative M-Test Result

(Left) Evaluation p-values compared against uniform distribution quantiles. If observations are consistent with the test-distribution (assuming the forecast is true) the quantile scores should follow an exponential distribution. (Right) Quantile scores plotted progressively during the Ridgecrest sequence. The shaded gray regions indicate critical regions assuming α = 5%.

Cumulative L-Test Result

(Left) Evaluation p-values compared against uniform distribution quantiles. If observations are consistent with the test-distribution (assuming the forecast is true) the quantile scores should follow an exponential distribution. (Right) Quantile scores plotted progressively during the Ridgecrest sequence. The shaded gray regions indicate critical regions assuming α = 5%.

Cumulative S-Test Result

(Left) Evaluation p-values compared against uniform distribution quantiles. If observations are consistent with the test-distribution (assuming the forecast is true) the quantile scores should follow an exponential distribution. (Right) Quantile scores plotted progressively during the Ridgecrest sequence. The shaded gray regions indicate critical regions assuming α = 5%.

Cumulative IEDD-Test Result

(Left) Evaluation p-values compared against uniform distribution quantiles. If observations are consistent with the test-distribution (assuming the forecast is true) the quantile scores should follow an exponential distribution. (Right) Quantile scores plotted progressively during the Ridgecrest sequence. The shaded gray regions indicate critical regions assuming α = 5%.

Cumulative IETD-Test Result

(Left) Evaluation p-values compared against uniform distribution quantiles. If observations are consistent with the test-distribution (assuming the forecast is true) the quantile scores should follow an exponential distribution. (Right) Quantile scores plotted progressively during the Ridgecrest sequence. The shaded gray regions indicate critical regions assuming α = 5%.

Cumulative PROB-Test Result

(Left) Evaluation p-values compared against uniform distribution quantiles. If observations are consistent with the test-distribution (assuming the forecast is true) the quantile scores should follow an exponential distribution. (Right) Quantile scores plotted progressively during the Ridgecrest sequence. The shaded gray regions indicate critical regions assuming α = 5%.

Cumulative TERD-Test Result

(Left) Evaluation p-values compared against uniform distribution quantiles. If observations are consistent with the test-distribution (assuming the forecast is true) the quantile scores should follow an exponential distribution. (Right) Quantile scores plotted progressively during the Ridgecrest sequence. The shaded gray regions indicate critical regions assuming α = 5%.

Cumulative BV-Test Result

(Left) Evaluation p-values compared against uniform distribution quantiles. If observations are consistent with the test-distribution (assuming the forecast is true) the quantile scores should follow an exponential distribution. (Right) Quantile scores plotted progressively during the Ridgecrest sequence. The shaded gray regions indicate critical regions assuming α = 5%.

About

Supplementary material for BSSA Manuscript in Preparation about evaluating UCERF3-ETAS Simulations during the Ridgecrest sequence

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • Jupyter Notebook 98.9%
  • Python 1.1%