Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Upgrade jest to v29 (#113)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history 
* chore(deps): update unit test packages to v29

* test: use transform instead of globals for ts-jest setup

* chore: format codes

* chore: bump up for @types/jest

* chore: bump up for jest and jest-circus

---------

Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
  • Loading branch information
@kentaro-m @renovate
kentaro-m and renovate[bot] committed Feb 18, 2023
1 parent e227cc7 commit 7eac648
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 5 changed files with 2,663 additions and 6,519 deletions.
126 changes: 68 additions & 58 deletions __tests__/handler.test.ts
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {
test('exits the process if pull requests include skip words in the title', async () => {
const spy = jest.spyOn(core, 'info')

context.payload.pull_request.title = 'wip test'
context.payload.pull_request!.title = 'wip test'

const client = github.getOctokit('token')
const config = {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {

const spy = jest.spyOn(core, 'info')

context.payload.pull_request.draft = true
context.payload.pull_request!.draft = true

const client = github.getOctokit('token')
const config = {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -158,8 +158,8 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {
await handler.handlePullRequest(client, context, config)

expect(addAssigneesSpy).not.toBeCalled()
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers).toHaveLength(3)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers[0]).toMatch(
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers).toHaveLength(3)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers![0]).toMatch(
/reviewer/
)
})
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -194,8 +194,10 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {
await handler.handlePullRequest(client, context, config)

// THEN
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees).toHaveLength(1)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees[0]).toMatch('pr-creator')
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees).toHaveLength(1)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees![0]).toMatch(
'pr-creator'
)
expect(requestReviewersSpy).not.toBeCalled()
})

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -259,9 +261,9 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {

await handler.handlePullRequest(client, context, config)

expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees).toHaveLength(3)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees[0]).toMatch(/reviewer/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees).toEqual(
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees).toHaveLength(3)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees![0]).toMatch(/reviewer/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees).toEqual(
expect.arrayContaining(['reviewer1', 'reviewer2', 'reviewer3'])
)
expect(requestReviewersSpy).not.toBeCalled()
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -300,8 +302,8 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {

await handler.handlePullRequest(client, context, config)

expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees).toHaveLength(1)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees).toEqual(
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees).toHaveLength(1)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees).toEqual(
expect.arrayContaining(['assignee1'])
)
expect(requestReviewersSpy).not.toBeCalled()
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -339,10 +341,10 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {

await handler.handlePullRequest(client, context, config)

expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees).toHaveLength(2)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees[0]).toMatch(/assignee/)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers).toHaveLength(2)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers[0]).toMatch(
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees).toHaveLength(2)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees![0]).toMatch(/assignee/)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers).toHaveLength(2)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers![0]).toMatch(
/reviewer/
)
})
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -414,8 +416,8 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {

await handler.handlePullRequest(client, context, config)

expect(spy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees).toHaveLength(2)
expect(spy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees[0]).toMatch(/maintainer/)
expect(spy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees).toHaveLength(2)
expect(spy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees![0]).toMatch(/maintainer/)
})

test('adds reviewers to pull requests if throws error to add assignees', async () => {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -448,8 +450,8 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {

await handler.handlePullRequest(client, context, config)

expect(spy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers).toHaveLength(2)
expect(spy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers[0]).toMatch(/reviewer/)
expect(spy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers).toHaveLength(2)
expect(spy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers![0]).toMatch(/reviewer/)
})

/*
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -542,8 +544,8 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {
await handler.handlePullRequest(client, context, config)

// THEN
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers).toHaveLength(1)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers[0]).toMatch(
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers).toHaveLength(1)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers![0]).toMatch(
/reviewer/
)
expect(addAssigneesSpy).not.toBeCalled()
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -587,9 +589,13 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {
await handler.handlePullRequest(client, context, config)

// THEN
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers).toHaveLength(2)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers[0]).toMatch(/group1/)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers[1]).toMatch(/group2/)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers).toHaveLength(2)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers![0]).toMatch(
/group1/
)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers![1]).toMatch(
/group2/
)
expect(addAssigneesSpy).not.toBeCalled()
})

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -631,10 +637,14 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {
await handler.handlePullRequest(client, context, config)

// THEN
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers).toHaveLength(3)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers[0]).toMatch(/group1/)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers[1]).toMatch(/group1/)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers[2]).toMatch(
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers).toHaveLength(3)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers![0]).toMatch(
/group1/
)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers![1]).toMatch(
/group1/
)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers![2]).toMatch(
/group2-user1/
)
expect(addAssigneesSpy).not.toBeCalled()
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -681,10 +691,10 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {
await handler.handlePullRequest(client, context, config)

// THEN
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees).toHaveLength(3)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees[0]).toMatch(/group1/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees[1]).toMatch(/group2/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees[2]).toMatch(/group3/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees).toHaveLength(3)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees![0]).toMatch(/group1/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees![1]).toMatch(/group2/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees![2]).toMatch(/group3/)
expect(requestReviewersSpy).not.toBeCalled()
})

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -728,10 +738,10 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {
await handler.handlePullRequest(client, context, config)

// THEN
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees).toHaveLength(3)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees[0]).toMatch(/group1/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees[1]).toMatch(/group2/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees[2]).toMatch(/group3/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees).toHaveLength(3)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees![0]).toMatch(/group1/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees![1]).toMatch(/group2/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees![2]).toMatch(/group3/)
expect(requestReviewersSpy).not.toBeCalled()
})

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -775,10 +785,10 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {
await handler.handlePullRequest(client, context, config)

// THEN
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees).toHaveLength(3)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees[0]).toMatch(/group1/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees[1]).toMatch(/group2/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees[2]).toMatch(/group3/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees).toHaveLength(3)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees![0]).toMatch(/group1/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees![1]).toMatch(/group2/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees![2]).toMatch(/group3/)
expect(requestReviewersSpy).not.toBeCalled()
})

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -823,16 +833,16 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {
await handler.handlePullRequest(client, context, config)

// THEN
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees).toHaveLength(3)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees[0]).toMatch(/group1/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees[1]).toMatch(/group2/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees[2]).toMatch(/group3/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees).toHaveLength(3)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees![0]).toMatch(/group1/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees![1]).toMatch(/group2/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees![2]).toMatch(/group3/)

expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers).toHaveLength(2)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers[0]).toMatch(
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers).toHaveLength(2)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers![0]).toMatch(
/reviewer/
)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers[1]).toMatch(
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers![1]).toMatch(
/reviewer/
)
})
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -878,17 +888,17 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {
await handler.handlePullRequest(client, context, config)

// THEN
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees).toHaveLength(1)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0].assignees[0]).toMatch(/assignee/)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees).toHaveLength(1)
expect(addAssigneesSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.assignees![0]).toMatch(/assignee/)

expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers).toHaveLength(5)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers[0]).toMatch(
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers).toHaveLength(5)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers![0]).toMatch(
/group1-reviewer/
)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers[2]).toMatch(
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers![2]).toMatch(
/group2-reviewer/
)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers[3]).toMatch(
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers![3]).toMatch(
/group3-reviewer/
)
})
Expand All @@ -901,7 +911,7 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {
filterLabels: { include: ['test_label'] },
} as any

context.payload.pull_request.labels = [{ name: 'some_label' }]
context.payload.pull_request!.labels = [{ name: 'some_label' }]

await handler.handlePullRequest(client, context, config)

Expand All @@ -918,7 +928,7 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {
filterLabels: { include: ['test_label'], exclude: ['wip'] },
} as any

context.payload.pull_request.labels = [
context.payload.pull_request!.labels = [
{ name: 'test_label' },
{ name: 'wip' },
]
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -951,7 +961,7 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {
reviewers: ['reviewer1', 'reviewer2', 'reviewer3', 'pr-creator'],
} as any

context.payload.pull_request.labels = [{ name: 'some_label' }]
context.payload.pull_request!.labels = [{ name: 'some_label' }]

const client = github.getOctokit('token')

Expand All @@ -964,8 +974,8 @@ describe('handlePullRequest', () => {
await handler.handlePullRequest(client, context, config)

expect(addAssigneesSpy).not.toBeCalled()
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers).toHaveLength(3)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0].reviewers[0]).toMatch(
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers).toHaveLength(3)
expect(requestReviewersSpy.mock.calls[0][0]?.reviewers![0]).toMatch(
/reviewer/
)
})
Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions __tests__/run.test.ts
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ describe.only('run', () => {
return 'token'
case 'configuration-path':
return '.github/auto_assign.yml'
default:
return ''
}
})

Expand Down
8 changes: 3 additions & 5 deletions jest.config.js
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,9 +8,7 @@ module.exports = {
'^.+\\.ts$': 'ts-jest'
},
verbose: true,
globals: {
'ts-jest': {
tsconfig: './__tests__/tsconfig.jest.json'
}
}
transform: {
'^.+\\.(ts|tsx)$': 'ts-jest'
},
}
Loading

0 comments on commit 7eac648

Please sign in to comment.