-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[GeoNode] Projection issue in the layers #395
Comments
|
@felix-yew for the layers that are not in 4326, where are they getting 4326 in their metadata? Is the QGIS user (you?) doing that or is the system applying the wrong CRS in the metadata during upload? |
mas @felix-yew did you upload the layer with metadata? The metadata needs to be consistent with the actual CRS (and also the extent inside the layer). |
Me and @felix-yew just tried with the data that already stored in Geonode InaSAFE (Jakarta_District_WGS84): Download it -> Open in QGIS -> Save as new layer with new CRS (UTM 49S) -> Upload to geonode And i got same problem with the other layers. the thumbnail is missing and it become WGS84 in metadata: I already check the metadata in qgis and it originally in UTM 48S: So i think Geonode tried to change the projection to EPSG 4326 where the data itself in EPSG 32748 (UTM 49S) |
Hi @gubuntu - thank you for response this issue. Actually this issue find by mas @adissadis when upload some material training to geonode. And, then he asked me about this issue, so I try it by download the layer then check it in QGIS for the actual projection, (and I am sure that the file is in UTM).
Like mas Adis said, we only upload the original layer (with UTM projection). So, I guess the geonode change only the projection system without the extent layer to EPSG:4326.
yes mas @lucernae - we also upload the xml file with the original file. |
Sounds like a bug |
Can you share the file so I can check it later mas @felix-yew?
…On Jan 12, 2018 13:09, "Gavin Fleming" ***@***.***> wrote:
Sounds like a bug
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#395 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAyxeVGCZE5Rkwyo4sLtHljxnxi1BvNTks5tJvcSgaJpZM4Rat1Q>
.
|
mas @lucernae you can try by download one of the layers with other EPSG:4326, ie. http://geonode.inasafe.org/layers/geonode:krb3_49s (this layer in UTM projection). Or, maybe mas @adissadis can share the original data to mas @lucernae ? |
Here's some example: |
confirmed as a bug with that sample data set. GeoNode or QGIS is not respecting the CRS of the layer and assumes it is 4326. |
possibly related: GeoNode#3593 |
This is known bug, yes GeoNode#3482 |
@gubuntu from my investigation yesterday I noticed the following:
|
#411 related |
fix this while fixing #289 |
i think this problem has been solved. |
maybe, but there's no thumbnail |
the missing thumbnail is because i was testing #426 for testing purpose, i've just uploaded the new one: http://testing.geonode.kartoza.com/layers/geonode:jalan_sleman_49s |
From @felix-yew on January 11, 2018 9:33
Problem
When we finish upload some layers that have projection in geographical (EPSG:4326), ie jakarta_flood_18113_wgs_no_kw's layer, we can see that the layers can show in list of layer, especially in the thumbnail view that can directly show the type of layer. Then, it will different if we upload some layer with the differerent projection (in addition to EPSG:4326), ie UTM zone 49s, we find a problem to see the thumbnail view. In the list of layer, we can see that the Jalan_Sleman_49s's layer do not have a thumbnail view in the fixed view. See the image below:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/921ef/921ef2d597ff3d6ca389d56441ef824eebb55d40" alt="image"
Let see the different layer with the different projection, in the image below:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92797/927970e170fd53c25ce4beb2cde6adf8876cbd5a" alt="image"
When we check it in the metadata details, there have a different between them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42074/42074333cfd006ffd58382e0c22691933172dcae" alt="image"
In this case, in the left side, maybe it is same explanation like map view. I think the layer shown but in the very small size. And when we see the layer extent look strange because the Projection System indicate that the layer in EPSG:4326 but why the layer extent show the different format (metres). This case also appear in the list of layer thumbnail preview.
In the right side, the extent layer show accordance with the Projection System. So the layer can directly show in the map view.
I assume that:
The question is:
Do uploading layer into the geonode will change or transform coordinate to EPSG:4326? If yes, maybe the coordinate transformation also included the extent layer (ie. from metres/UTM to geographic coordinate)
Expected Behaviour
If the CRS of layer need to transform into the WGS84 projection, it will better if the extent of layer also transform into the geographical coordinate.
Environment
geonode.inasafe.org
Proposed Solution
Make it happy.
@samnawi @adissadis @lucernae @gubuntu
Copied from original issue: inasafe/inasafe#4856
depends on #437
child of #457
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: