Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve clarity around namespace usage in k8sgpt operator workflow #131

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2024

Conversation

100daysofdevops
Copy link
Contributor

The current workflow for the k8sgpt operator installation is potentially confusing. During installation, users are instructed to:

Create the k8sgpt-operator-system namespace.
Deploy a secret into the k8sgpt-operator-system namespace. Deploy the k8sgpt resource into the same namespace. However, when checking the results, the instructions direct users to use the default namespace. This discrepancy can lead to confusion about where resources and results are expected to be located.

This commit aims to address and clarify namespace usage throughout the operator installation and result-checking process to ensure consistency and reduce confusion for users.

Closes #

📑 Description

This pull request clarifies the namespace usage during the k8sgpt operator installation workflow. It aligns the instructions for namespace creation, secret deployment, and result-checking to reduce user confusion and ensure consistency.

✅ Checks

  • [✅ ] My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • [✅] I have updated the documentation as required
  • [✅] All the tests have passed

ℹ Additional Information

This update ensures that all commands and instructions consistently refer to the k8sgpt-operator-system namespace unless explicitly stated otherwise. No breaking changes are introduced. Documentation updates include adjustments to installation and result-checking steps. Screenshots and examples illustrating the workflow have also been added to the documentation.

The current workflow for the k8sgpt operator installation is potentially confusing. During installation, users are instructed to:

Create the k8sgpt-operator-system namespace.
Deploy a secret into the k8sgpt-operator-system namespace.
Deploy the k8sgpt resource into the same namespace.
However, when checking the results, the instructions direct users to use the default namespace. This discrepancy can lead to confusion about where resources and results are expected to be located.

This commit aims to address and clarify namespace usage throughout the operator installation and result-checking process to ensure consistency and reduce confusion for users.

Signed-off-by: 100daysofdevops <47483190+100daysofdevops@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Deploy Preview for meek-marigold-103c48 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 4cafdbb
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/meek-marigold-103c48/deploys/675c83d18e7d770008592331
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-131--meek-marigold-103c48.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@AlexsJones AlexsJones merged commit ee218f1 into k8sgpt-ai:main Dec 15, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants