Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Added decision making/voting details and founding members. #33

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2023
Merged

Added decision making/voting details and founding members. #33

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
91d4e91
Added decision making/voting details and founding members.
ericsnekbytes Nov 29, 2023
f05a816
Added Carol and Paul to the list :)
ericsnekbytes Dec 1, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions charter.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -35,3 +35,20 @@ The Docs Working Group will focus on the efforts described below, in service of
- Automated discourse or CI bots for gathering user feedback from community sites
- Adding a new embedded "Hot Topics" feature on ReadTheDocs FAQ pages to automated discourse community discussion aggregator
- Any other innovations or work that may improve Jovyans' experience in/understanding of the Jupyter ecosystem

Founding Members

- Carlos Brandt
- Carol Willing
- Eric Gentry
- Frederic Collonval
- Mike Krassowski
- Nick Bollweg
- Paul Ivanov
- Rosio Reyes
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add me as a founding member. Thanks.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Which also begs the question: are we missing others on this list as well? I would definitely like to see Chris Holgraf to be part of this group and Tania Allard as well if they have interest.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ivanov and @Carreau if they have interest as well.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks,

While I have interest and I'm still actively working on papyri which is still part of a CZI grant for the next few month, I don't have much time and don't want to guaranty I can participate in all that.

Papyri definitely fit into all the "cross-cutting" area and I'd love to get some help from this committee to steer it, or get it integrated into JupyterLab and the other Jupyter projects.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes please, I'm happy to be involved here.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add me as a founding member. Thanks.

Absolutely! I will add @ivanov (and @Carreau I can still add you if you'd like, don't feel obligated to spend a ton of time as partial participation is still valuable, let me know).

Which also begs the question: are we missing others on this list as well? I would definitely like to see Chris Holgraf to be part of this group and Tania Allard as well if they have interest.

This would be GREAT, please reach out to anyone you can think of who might be interested, we would love to have their thoughts and experience to help us do our work :) I will reach out to @choldgraf on discourse.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just added @willingc and @ivanov, you should see the updates now!


Decision Making

The Docs Working Group will establish a council (by Jupyter convention) to make decisions.

The Docs Working Group Council will initially be made up of the founding members. Council members can then initiate a vote to add new members (or remove members by a two thirds majority with a quorum of two thirds of all council members). The voting process will follow the guidelines established in the [Jupyter Governance Decision Making document](https://jupyter.org/governance/decision_making.html).