Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add workflows for simplified publish #993

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 27, 2022

Conversation

blink1073
Copy link
Contributor

Experimental support for the simplified releaser workflow. I added tag protection to this repository, meaning only those with "admin write" access can use the publish workflow.

@blink1073
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'd like to use this tomorrow to make another rc release.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 25, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 72.54% // Head: 72.54% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (278b50d) compared to base (c49df47).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #993   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.54%   72.54%           
=======================================
  Files          64       64           
  Lines        8243     8243           
  Branches     1378     1378           
=======================================
  Hits         5980     5980           
  Misses       1848     1848           
  Partials      415      415           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@blink1073 blink1073 merged commit b8fe9d0 into jupyter-server:main Sep 27, 2022
@blink1073 blink1073 deleted the simplified-publish branch September 27, 2022 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants