Document client OS support in a table #141
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Needs a line for OpenBSD! :D |
|
I just looked at https://tailscale.com/download for a list |
kradalby
reviewed
Oct 4, 2021
kradalby
reviewed
Oct 4, 2021
Co-authored-by: Kristoffer Dalby <kradalby@kradalby.no>
Co-authored-by: Kristoffer Dalby <kradalby@kradalby.no>
|
I think this looks like a good start :), I added some comments to point users in the right direction. Without having tested, I assume Windows users can override the control URL via som regedit/HKEY magic, would be great if someone who figure that out can add a note about that :) |
kradalby
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2021
|
I was going to ask about that. It works when I run it via CLI, but doesn't seem to come back up after install for windows |
|
I don't have a windows machine, so can't help test, you can try to ask in discord. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Would this be a good documentation improvement as discussed in #58 ?