-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Script to make HTML pages and PDF plots more user-friendly #12
Comments
@juska @hatakeyamak can you give a try if you find the plotting script interface usable by you? Attached is a DQM root file for testing. |
Hey, Thanks. I will try. |
I'm now able to run the code without any problems by simply following the instructions in README, thanks a lot Joosep for the update! (I'm only in the reco processing step for now though) I am waiting to hear back from Chad for hearing what is the 'official' match definition. If the deltaR requirement was something else than 0.2, that's one important fix. The convention is that it is half the cone size (or radius parameter in case of anti-kT), so we should have it at 0.2 as we have R=0.4 jets. I'll get back to you later today. I'll fix the pfreso.py to take the files as input and to spit out another file for the compare.py to use, and I'll try to see if I can recreate my nanoAOD resolution result with the DQM code. |
Hi Joosep @jpata
I still get the following error in the DQM step:
[juska@lxplus104 tmp3]$ pwd
/afs/cern.ch/user/j/juska/work/pfdev/CMSSW_9_4_11/src/Validation/RecoParticleFlow/tmp3
[juska@lxplus104 tmp3]$ ls
QCD
[juska@lxplus104 tmp3]$ sh $CMSSW_BASE/src/Validation/RecoParticleFlow/test/run_relval.sh QCD dqm 0
/afs/cern.ch/work/j/juska/pfdev/CMSSW_9_4_11/src/Validation/RecoParticleFlow/test/filelist_QCD.txt QCD DQM 0
Running step DQM
ls: cannot access step3.*.*.root: No such file or directory
step3 filenames for DQM:
Cheers,
Juska
…On 1/25/19 2:43 AM, Joosep Pata wrote:
@juska <https://github.com/juska> @hatakeyamak
<https://github.com/hatakeyamak> can you give a try if you find the
interface usable by you? Attached is a DQM root file for testing.
DQM_V0001_R000000001__Global__CMSSW_X_Y_Z__RECO.root.zip
<https://github.com/jpata/cmssw/files/2794318/DQM_V0001_R000000001__Global__CMSSW_X_Y_Z__RECO.root.zip>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#12 (comment)>, or
mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHKcoBUm5FPgJvnnqP8lA0djLBTpVA71ks5vGmE5gaJpZM4aR6Ad>.
|
Ah sorry, I had edited the script |
The comparison script now has the following default commandline interface
and usage can be as simple as
in order to produce the folder I'm closing this issue, please make a new one in case you have additional suggestions or wishes how the plots should be called. |
We use the script https://github.com/jpata/cmssw/blob/pfvalidation/Validation/RecoParticleFlow/test/compare.py
to create A vs B type comparison plots from
DQM*.root
files.I'm working on creating a more convenient command line interface for that script, something along the lines of
would compare 3 versions of the sample QCD (DQMFile[1-3].root) and 3 versions of the sample QCDNoPu (DQMFile[4-6].root) and plot the histograms
reso_dist_10_24_eta05:reso_dist_10_24_eta13
from the folderJetResponse
on a canvasreso_dist_10_24
.@hatakeyamak @juska would appreciate your thoughts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: