Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

periodicals should not include day #64

Closed
jacobmerson opened this issue Nov 20, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

periodicals should not include day #64

jacobmerson opened this issue Nov 20, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@jacobmerson
Copy link

Periodicals should list the month and year, but should not include the day. Conference proceedings, patents, etc. do include the day.

See the ieee reference guide page

@josephwright
Copy link
Owner

@moewew Is there a simple 'date format per entry type' function? I don't remember one ...

@moewew
Copy link
Contributor

moewew commented Dec 2, 2021

Unfortunately, there is no interface yet for per-type date settings. I looked at this a while ago, but there were difficulties with the interface as well as a possible implementation. Thoughts are always welcome. See plk/biblatex#863.

For now you can use the internal implementation of the date formats, e.g. https://github.com/michal-h21/biblatex-iso690/blob/86fd078483eabd7ee929a872a309547a1ecc5179/iso.bbx#L512-L515 or https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/419719/35864 (look for \changedateformat). Of course this uses internals which may not be as stable as a simple option.

If you only need to get rid of the day for some types you can of course use the old \clearfield approach.

@josephwright
Copy link
Owner

@moewew Thanks: what I thought

I'm reluctant to 'force' dropping of data by adding \clearfield to the style - that's irreversible so users can't override it (say if they have a newspaper article or similar that does need the day). Probably therefore one for the docs: a lot of people will only have the day in when they need it anyway.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants