Add the ability to build with parameters

[olivierdagenais]

The /team-build/ endpoint now supports /team-build/buildWithParameters/JOB_NAME in both structured form and legacy form modes.

Manual testing

1. Given the following buildWithParameters.json file:

   {
       "parameter":
       [
           {"name": "id", "value": "123"},
           {"name": "verbosity", "value": "high"}
       ],
       "team-parameters":
       {
           "collectionUri":"https://mseng.visualstudio.com",
           "repoUri":"https://mseng.visualstudio.com/Personal/_git/olivida.gcm4ml",
           "projectId":"Personal",
           "repoId":"olivida.gcm4ml",
           "commit":"8a76fbe5c9e087491d672c7951bf2613be35de44",
           "pushedBy":"olivida"
       }
   }

   ...run the following command to test the structured form mode: curl --request PUT http://localhost:9090/team-build/build/param --data-urlencode json@buildWithParameters.json --user remote:92e9d8998a8c005697d252f09a2a311b and notice that:

   1. the param job is indeed triggered
   2. the job's parameters are set as specified
   3. the specified commit is fetched by the Git plugin
   4. the specified commit in Team Services has statuses added for the build being pending and then successful

2. Run the following command for the complete equivalent in legacy form mode: curl --request PUT http://localhost:9090/team-build/build/param --data id=123 --data verbosity=high --data _team-build_Build.Repository.Provider=TfGit --data _team-build_System.TeamFoundationCollectionUri=https://mseng.visualstudio.com --data _team-build_Build.Repository.Uri=https://mseng.visualstudio.com/Personal/_git/olivida.gcm4ml --data _team-build_System.TeamProject=Personal --data _team-build_Build.Repository.Name=olivida.gcm4ml --data _team-build_Build.SourceVersion=8a76fbe5c9e087491d672c7951bf2613be35de44 --data _team-build_Build.RequestedFor=olivida --user remote:92e9d8998a8c005697d252f09a2a311b
   ...and notice it has the exact same consequences!

Mission accomplished!

[jasholl]

I've tested this briefly both build and build with parameters. The only thing I noticed is I was getting a 200 back -- shouldn't it be sending a 201 instead?

[olivierdagenais]

The only thing I noticed is I was getting a 200 back -- shouldn't it be sending a 201 instead?

Good catch! I've fixed this in 87084ab.