Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust Stapler parent module name and description #460

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 12, 2023

Conversation

Vlatombe
Copy link
Member

This fixes a very small annoyance while building the project: both the aggregator and the core module have the same name, so the maven summary ended up like

[INFO] Reactor Summary for Stapler Parent 999999-SNAPSHOT:
[INFO]
[INFO] Stapler ............................................ SUCCESS [  0.367 s]
[INFO] Stapler ............................................ SUCCESS [  0.178 s]
[INFO] Stapler JSP module ................................. SUCCESS [  0.031 s]
[INFO] Stapler Jelly module ............................... SUCCESS [  0.041 s]
[INFO] Stapler Groovy module .............................. SUCCESS [  0.067 s]
[INFO] Stapler JRebel module .............................. SUCCESS [  0.030 s]
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------

which is not allowing to distinguish the 2 modules.

This updates the aggregator module name and description so that it is clearer.

Testing done

Submitter checklist

  • Make sure you are opening from a topic/feature/bugfix branch (right side) and not your main branch!
  • Ensure that the pull request title represents the desired changelog entry
  • Please describe what you did
  • Link to relevant issues in GitHub or Jira
  • Link to relevant pull requests, esp. upstream and downstream changes
  • Ensure you have provided tests - that demonstrates feature works or fixes the issue

@jglick jglick added the chore label May 12, 2023
@jglick jglick enabled auto-merge May 12, 2023 14:55
@jglick jglick merged commit a831567 into jenkinsci:master May 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants