Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 19, 2024. It is now read-only.

Remove agent-to-controller calls #245

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2021
Merged

Remove agent-to-controller calls #245

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2021

Conversation

jglick
Copy link
Member

@jglick jglick commented Nov 4, 2021

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 4, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #245 (95974c5) into master (1709fa7) will decrease coverage by 0.17%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #245      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     58.17%   58.00%   -0.18%     
  Complexity      483      483              
============================================
  Files            56       56              
  Lines          2305     2298       -7     
  Branches        290      289       -1     
============================================
- Hits           1341     1333       -8     
- Misses          858      859       +1     
  Partials        106      106              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ugins/coverage/detector/AntPathReportDetector.java 80.00% <100.00%> (-3.34%) ⬇️
...ins/coverage/source/DefaultSourceFileResolver.java 55.85% <100.00%> (-2.77%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1709fa7...95974c5. Read the comment docs.

@timja timja added the bug Bugs or performance problems label Nov 4, 2021
throw new SecurityException("refusing to " + name + " on " + path);
}

@Extension public static class ChannelConfiguratorImpl extends ChannelConfigurator {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this be a TestExtension?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, because that would only apply within a single test. This deliberately gets loaded in all tests in the plugin.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Bugs or performance problems
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants