Create additional config for notification display fields and refactor #334
Conversation
…e and kafka partition key
|
Task linked: CU-86c083kqv Create Config Flag for Kafka Key |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve significant modifications to several classes and configuration files related to Kafka partition key generation and notification display. A new method Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-d.json (1)
116-122: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayarrays aligns well with the PR objectives. These changes provide clear configuration for Kafka key generation and notification display fields, which enhances the flexibility and maintainability of the system.Consider adding a brief comment above each new array to explain their purpose. For example:
// Fields used to generate Kafka partition keys "fieldsForKafkaKeyGen": [ "given_name", "family_name" ], // Fields to be displayed in notifications "nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay": [ "given_name", "family_name" ],This would improve the self-documentation of the configuration file.
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp.json (2)
177-183: LGTM! Consider adding comments for clarity.The addition of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayaligns well with the PR objectives. These new fields provide a clear separation of concerns for Kafka key generation and notification display, which is a good practice.Consider adding brief comments to explain the purpose of these fields:
{ + // Fields used to generate the Kafka partition key "fieldsForKafkaKeyGen": [ "given_name", "family_name" ], + // Fields used to display names in notifications "nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay": [ "given_name", "family_name" ], }This would enhance the configuration's self-documentation and make it easier for other developers to understand the purpose of these fields.
Line range hint
1-220: Overall structure maintains integrity while adding new functionality.The changes to this configuration file are well-structured and maintain the integrity of the existing configuration. The additions of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayenhance the file's functionality without disrupting the existing fields or rules.Key observations:
- The new fields are logically placed within the file structure.
- Existing configurations, including the complex linking rules, remain unchanged, minimizing the risk of unintended side effects.
- The changes align with the PR objectives of creating a configuration for notification display fields and refactoring related to the Kafka partition key.
As the configuration grows, consider splitting it into separate files for different concerns (e.g., Kafka configuration, notification configuration, linking rules) to improve maintainability. This could be a future refactoring task if the configuration continues to expand.
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-d-validate-dp-match-dp.json (1)
225-231: LGTM! Consider adding inline comments for clarity.The addition of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayimproves the configuration's flexibility and aligns with the PR objectives. The separation of concerns between Kafka key generation and notification display is a good practice.Consider adding inline comments to explain the purpose of these new fields, especially how they relate to the removed
nameValidationFields. This would improve maintainability. For example:"fieldsForKafkaKeyGen": [ // Fields used to generate Kafka partition keys "given_name", "family_name" ], "nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay": [ // Fields used for displaying names in notifications "given_name", "family_name" ]JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_AsyncReceiver/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/async_receiver/Main.java (1)
186-208: LGTM: Well-structured partition key generation method.The
generateKafkaPartitionKeymethod is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. It encapsulates the logic for generating Kafka partition keys, uses configurable fields, and ensures a non-null return value. The use of the Soundex algorithm for phonetic matching is a good approach.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider moving the logging statement to a debug level to avoid potential performance issues in production:
-LOGGER.info("Using Kafka topic/partition: {}", partitionKeyStr); +LOGGER.debug("Using Kafka topic/partition: {}", partitionKeyStr);This change would reduce log verbosity in production while still providing valuable information during development and debugging.
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Linker/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/linker/backend/LinkerDWH.java (1)
98-107: Approve refactoring ofpatientNamemethod with a suggestion for improvementThe refactoring of the
patientNamemethod is a good improvement. It now uses a more flexible approach by leveraging theFIELDS_CONFIG.nameFieldsForNotificationDisplayconfiguration, which allows for easier maintenance and customization of the patient name display.To improve readability, consider extracting the stream operation into a separate method. This would make the
patientNamemethod more concise and easier to understand at a glance. For example:private static String patientName(final Interaction interaction) { var patientRecord = interaction.demographicData(); - String patientDisplayName = FIELDS_CONFIG.nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay.stream() - .map(fieldName -> patientRecord.fields.stream() - .filter(field -> fieldName.equals( - field.ccTag())) - .map(DemographicData.DemographicField::value) - .findFirst() - .orElse("")) - .collect(Collectors.joining(" ")) - .trim(); - return patientDisplayName; + return buildPatientDisplayName(patientRecord); } + + private static String buildPatientDisplayName(DemographicData patientRecord) { + return FIELDS_CONFIG.nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay.stream() + .map(fieldName -> patientRecord.fields.stream() + .filter(field -> fieldName.equals(field.ccTag())) + .map(DemographicData.DemographicField::value) + .findFirst() + .orElse("")) + .collect(Collectors.joining(" ")) + .trim(); + }This change would make the
patientNamemethod more concise while moving the complex stream operation to a dedicated method with a descriptive name.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_AsyncReceiver/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/async_receiver/Main.java (3 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_EM_Scala/src/main/scala/org/jembi/jempi/em/config/Config.scala (1 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/FieldsConfig.java (2 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/input/JsonConfig.java (1 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/input/NameFieldsForKafkaKeyGen.java (1 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/models/ConfigurationModel.java (1 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Linker/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/linker/backend/LinkerDWH.java (1 hunks)
- devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-auto-generate-fields.json (1 hunks)
- devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-d-validate-dp-match-dp.json (1 hunks)
- devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-d.json (1 hunks)
- devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp-minimal.json (1 hunks)
- devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (18)
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/input/NameFieldsForKafkaKeyGen.java (1)
7-9: LGTM! Renaming improves clarity but verify usage.The renaming of the record from
NameValidationFieldstoNameFieldsForKafkaKeyGenand its field fromnameValidationFieldstonameFieldsForKafkaKeyGenimproves clarity about the purpose of this configuration. This change aligns well with the PR objective of creating a configuration for Kafka key generation.To ensure that this change doesn't break existing code, please verify all usages of this record across the codebase. Run the following script to find all occurrences:
Make sure to update all references to use the new names.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Renaming does not impact other parts of the codebase.
The renaming of the record
NameFieldsForKafkaKeyGenand its fieldnameFieldsForKafkaKeyGenis localized toNameFieldsForKafkaKeyGen.javawith no references found elsewhere. This change enhances clarity without affecting other components.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of the old and new record names echo "Searching for old record name 'NameValidationFields':" rg --type java "NameValidationFields" echo "\nSearching for new record name 'NameFieldsForKafkaKeyGen':" rg --type java "NameFieldsForKafkaKeyGen" echo "\nSearching for old field name 'nameValidationFields':" rg --type java "nameValidationFields" echo "\nSearching for new field name 'nameFieldsForKafkaKeyGen':" rg --type java "nameFieldsForKafkaKeyGen"Length of output: 979
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/input/JsonConfig.java (1)
22-23: LGTM! New fields added as per PR objectives.The addition of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayaligns with the PR objectives. The fields are properly annotated with@JsonPropertyfor correct JSON serialization/deserialization.To ensure that the removal of
nameValidationFieldsdoesn't break existing functionality, please run the following script:Consider adding Javadoc comments to describe the purpose and expected content of these new fields. This will help other developers understand their usage. For example:
/** * List of field names used for generating Kafka partition keys. */ @JsonProperty("fieldsForKafkaKeyGen") List<String> fieldsForKafkaKeyGen, /** * List of name fields to be displayed in notifications. */ @JsonProperty("nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay") List<String> nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay,✅ Verification successful
Changes Verified Successfully
The removal of
nameValidationFieldswas confirmed as it is no longer used in the codebase. No remaining references were found in any files.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of the removed field 'nameValidationFields' # Test: Search for 'nameValidationFields' usage in Java files rg --type java 'nameValidationFields' # Test: Search for 'nameValidationFields' in JSON config files rg --type json 'nameValidationFields'Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for any usage of the removed field 'nameValidationFields' # Search for 'nameValidationFields' in all files rg 'nameValidationFields' # If rg is not available, use fd combined with grep as a fallback if ! command -v rg &> /dev/null then echo "rg not found, using fd and grep as fallback." fd --type f | xargs grep -i 'nameValidationFields' fiLength of output: 41
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_EM_Scala/src/main/scala/org/jembi/jempi/em/config/Config.scala (1)
64-70: Review of changes to theConfigcase classThe modifications to the
Configcase class align with the PR objectives and introduce new configuration options for Kafka key generation and notification display. However, there are a few points to consider:
The addition of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayfields is consistent with the PR summary and objectives.The removal of
nameValidationFieldsmight impact existing code that relies on this field. Ensure that all references to this field have been updated or removed throughout the codebase.Both new fields are of type
Option[List[String]], which allows for flexibility in configuration. However, consider if default values or documentation for these fields are needed to guide users on their proper usage.To ensure that the removal of
nameValidationFieldsdoesn't cause issues, please run the following script to check for any remaining references:Would you like assistance in updating the documentation or adding comments to explain the usage of these new fields?
✅ Verification successful
Verified Removal of
nameValidationFieldsThe removal of
nameValidationFieldsdoes not have any remaining references in Scala or JSON files.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to nameValidationFields # Search for nameValidationFields in Scala files echo "Searching for nameValidationFields in Scala files:" rg --type scala 'nameValidationFields' # Search for nameValidationFields in JSON configuration files echo "Searching for nameValidationFields in JSON files:" rg --type json 'nameValidationFields'Length of output: 296
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/models/ConfigurationModel.java (1)
19-20: LGTM! Consider verifying impact and updating documentation.The addition of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayaligns well with the PR objectives. This change improves the separation of concerns by having distinct fields for Kafka key generation and notification display.Please ensure that all parts of the codebase that previously used
nameValidationFieldshave been updated to use the new fields appropriately. Run the following script to verify:Consider updating any relevant documentation or comments to reflect these configuration changes, ensuring that developers understand the purpose and usage of these new fields.
✅ Verification successful
Verified! All references to
nameValidationFieldshave been successfully removed and the new fields are correctly implemented throughout the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of nameValidationFields and verify the usage of new fields # Search for any remaining usage of nameValidationFields echo "Checking for remaining usage of nameValidationFields:" rg "nameValidationFields" --type java # Verify the usage of new fields echo "Verifying usage of new fields:" rg "fieldsForKafkaKeyGen|nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay" --type javaLength of output: 2258
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-auto-generate-fields.json (1)
138-144: LGTM! New configuration fields added as expected.The changes align well with the PR objectives. Two new fields have been added:
fieldsForKafkaKeyGen: This appears to be used for generating Kafka partition keys.nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay: This seems to be used for displaying names in notifications.Both fields include "given_name" and "family_name", which are appropriate for these purposes.
To ensure these changes are properly integrated, please run the following script to verify the usage of these new fields in the application code:
This script will help ensure that:
- The new fields are being used in the application code.
- There are no leftover references to the old
nameValidationFields.✅ Verification successful
Verified! The new configuration fields are correctly integrated into the application code, and the old
nameValidationFieldshas been successfully removed with no remaining references.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new configuration fields in the application code. # Test 1: Search for usage of fieldsForKafkaKeyGen echo "Searching for fieldsForKafkaKeyGen usage:" rg --type java --type scala 'fieldsForKafkaKeyGen' # Test 2: Search for usage of nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay echo "Searching for nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay usage:" rg --type java --type scala 'nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay' # Test 3: Search for any remaining usage of the old nameValidationFields echo "Searching for any remaining usage of nameValidationFields:" rg --type java --type scala 'nameValidationFields'Length of output: 2758
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp-minimal.json (4)
192-198: Summary of changes and their impact.The changes in this configuration file are well-structured and align with the PR objectives:
- Added
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenfor specifying fields used in Kafka partition key generation.- Added
nameFieldsForNotificationDisplayfor specifying fields used in notification displays.- Removed the previous
nameValidationFields, replacing its functionality with more specific configurations.These changes improve the clarity and specificity of the configuration, allowing for more fine-grained control over Kafka key generation and notification displays. The rest of the configuration file remains unchanged, maintaining the existing functionality for other aspects of the system.
To ensure a smooth transition, please make sure to:
- Update any code that previously used
nameValidationFieldsto now use the appropriate new field.- Update documentation to reflect these new configuration options.
- Consider adding comments in the JSON file to explain the purpose of these new fields for future maintainers.
192-198: Verify the impact of removingnameValidationFields.The
nameValidationFieldshas been removed and replaced with more specific fields:fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplay. This change improves the clarity of the configuration. However, please ensure that all previous uses ofnameValidationFieldsin the codebase have been updated to use these new fields.Run the following script to check for any remaining uses of
nameValidationFields:#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining uses of nameValidationFields in the codebase rg --type-add 'config:*.{json,yaml,yml}' --type config --type java --type scala 'nameValidationFields'If any results are found, they may need to be updated to use the new fields.
192-195: New configuration for Kafka key generation added.The addition of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenaligns with the PR objective of creating a configuration flag for the Kafka key. This new field specifies which demographic fields should be used for generating the Kafka partition key.To ensure consistency, let's verify if these fields exist in the
demographicFieldssection:✅ Verification successful
Kafka key generation fields are valid.
All fields specified in
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenare present indemographicFields.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the fields used for Kafka key generation exist in demographicFields jq '.demographicFields[] | select(.fieldName == "given_name" or .fieldName == "family_name")' devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp-minimal.jsonLength of output: 752
196-198: New configuration for notification display fields added.The addition of
nameFieldsForNotificationDisplayaddresses the PR objective of creating a configuration related to notification display fields. This new field specifies which name fields should be used for displaying notifications.Let's verify if these fields exist in the
demographicFieldssection:devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-d-validate-dp-match-dp.json (2)
Line range hint
1-283: Summary: Configuration changes align with PR objectivesThe modifications to this configuration file successfully implement the creation of a Kafka key generation config and refactor the notification display fields. These changes improve the configuration's flexibility and clarity while maintaining consistency with the existing structure.
Key points:
- Addition of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenfor Kafka partition key generation.- Introduction of
nameFieldsForNotificationDisplayfor notification-specific name fields.- Removal of the previous
nameValidationFieldsarray.- Core functionality and rules remain unchanged.
The changes appear to be well-thought-out and aligned with the PR objectives. Ensure that the verification steps are completed to confirm there are no unintended side effects in other parts of the system.
Line range hint
1-283: Verify system-wide impact of configuration changesThe changes to this configuration file are focused and maintain consistency with the existing structure. The separation of Kafka key generation and notification display fields improves flexibility without disrupting the core functionality defined in the
rulessection.To ensure these changes don't cause issues elsewhere in the system, please run the following verification:
This script will help identify any code or configuration that might need to be updated to use the new
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayinstead of the oldnameValidationFields.JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/FieldsConfig.java (3)
93-96: LGTM: Proper initialization of fieldsForKafkaKeyGenThe initialization of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenis well-implemented:
- It correctly handles the case where
jsonConfig.fieldsForKafkaKeyGen()might be null.- Using
List.copyOf()ensures immutability of the list, which is a good practice.- The code is concise and readable.
97-99: LGTM: Consistent and proper initialization of nameFieldsForNotificationDisplayThe initialization of
nameFieldsForNotificationDisplayis well-implemented and consistent with the initialization offieldsForKafkaKeyGen:
- It correctly handles the case where
jsonConfig.nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay()might be null.- Using
List.copyOf()ensures immutability of the list, which is a good practice.- The code is concise and readable.
- The implementation maintains consistency with the initialization of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGen, which is good for code maintainability.
Line range hint
1-150: Overall assessment: Well-implemented changes with a minor suggestionThe changes in this file align well with the PR objectives to create additional configuration for notification display fields and refactor. The new fields
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayare correctly implemented and initialized, with proper null checks and immutability considerations.There's a minor suggestion to improve encapsulation by making these fields private and adding getter methods. Otherwise, the changes are well-structured, consistent, and achieve the intended goals of the PR.
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_AsyncReceiver/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/async_receiver/Main.java (3)
18-18: LGTM: Import of @NotNull annotation.The addition of the
@NotNullannotation import is a good practice for improving code clarity and enabling better static analysis. This can help catch potential null pointer exceptions early in the development process.
157-157: LGTM: Refactored partition key generation.The extraction of partition key generation logic into a separate method
generateKafkaPartitionKeyimproves code readability and maintainability. This change aligns well with the Single Responsibility Principle and the PR objectives.
Line range hint
1-324: Overall assessment: Well-executed refactoring with improved configurability.The changes in this PR successfully refactor the Kafka partition key generation logic, improving code organization and maintainability. The introduction of
FIELDS_CONFIG.fieldsForKafkaKeyGenenhances the configurability of the key generation process, aligning well with the PR objectives.Key improvements:
- Separation of concerns by extracting partition key generation into a dedicated method.
- Increased flexibility through configurable fields for key generation.
- Consistent use of the Soundex algorithm for phonetic matching.
- Proper null-safety considerations with the
@NotNullannotation.These changes contribute to a more robust and maintainable codebase without introducing apparent bugs or security issues.
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Linker/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/linker/backend/LinkerDWH.java (1)
98-107: Verify the impact ofpatientNamemethod changesWhile the refactoring of the
patientNamemethod is an improvement in terms of flexibility and maintainability, it's important to note that the behavior of the method has changed. The method now uses a configurable list of fields (FIELDS_CONFIG.nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay) to construct the patient name, which might result in different output compared to the previous implementation that specifically used given name and family name.Please ensure that:
- The
FIELDS_CONFIG.nameFieldsForNotificationDisplayis correctly configured to include all necessary name fields.- The new implementation produces the expected output for various test cases, including edge cases (e.g., missing fields, non-standard name formats).
- Any downstream code or systems that rely on the output of this method are compatible with the potentially changed format of the patient name.
To assist with verification, you can run the following script to check the usage of
patientNamemethod and the configuration ofnameFieldsForNotificationDisplay:This will help identify all places where the
patientNamemethod is used and where thenameFieldsForNotificationDisplayconfiguration is set or modified.✅ Verification successful
Impact of
patientNameMethod Changes VerifiedThe refactoring of the
patientNamemethod inLinkerDWH.javais confined to this class, and the configuration fornameFieldsForNotificationDisplayis appropriately managed inFieldsConfig.java. This limits the scope of changes and reduces potential side effects.Please ensure that:
- The
nameFieldsForNotificationDisplayincludes all necessary fields required for accurate patient name construction.- Comprehensive tests are conducted within
LinkerDWH.javato validate the new implementation across different scenarios, including edge cases.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check usage of patientName method echo "Usage of patientName method:" rg "patientName\(" --type java # Check configuration of nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay echo "\nConfiguration of nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay:" rg "nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay" --type javaLength of output: 2035
| "fieldsForKafkaKeyGen": [ | ||
| "given_name", | ||
| "family_name" | ||
| ], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
fieldsForKafkaKeyGen Configuration Defined but Not Utilized.
The fieldsForKafkaKeyGen is defined in Config.scala but is not currently used in any method related to Kafka partition key generation. Please ensure that this configuration is properly integrated into the Kafka partition key generation logic.
- File:
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_EM_Scala/src/main/scala/org/jembi/jempi/em/config/Config.scala - Configuration:
fieldsForKafkaKeyGen
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify usage of new Kafka key generation fields.
The new fieldsForKafkaKeyGen configuration aligns with the PR objective of creating a config flag for the Kafka key. To ensure proper implementation:
Run the following script to verify the usage of these fields in the codebase:
Ensure that the generateKafkaPartitionKey method in the Main class properly utilizes these configured fields for generating Kafka partition keys.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of fieldsForKafkaKeyGen in the codebase
# Test: Search for references to fieldsForKafkaKeyGen
# Expect: At least one occurrence in code that generates Kafka partition keys
rg --type-add 'scala:*.scala' --type scala 'fieldsForKafkaKeyGen'
# Test: Search for the new generateKafkaPartitionKey method
# Expect: Method implementation using the new configuration
ast-grep --lang scala --pattern $'def generateKafkaPartitionKey($_, $_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 292
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and usage of generateKafkaPartitionKey method
# Test 1: Search for the definition of generateKafkaPartitionKey in the codebase
ast-grep --lang scala --pattern $'def generateKafkaPartitionKey($_, $_) {
$$$
}'
# Test 2: Find all usages of fieldsForKafkaKeyGen in the codebase
rg --type-add 'scala:*.scala' --type scala 'fieldsForKafkaKeyGen'
Length of output: 292
| public final List<String> fieldsForKafkaKeyGen; | ||
| public final List<String> nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving encapsulation for new fields.
The new fields fieldsForKafkaKeyGen and nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay are correctly declared as final, which is good for immutability. However, they are also declared as public, which might violate encapsulation principles.
Consider making these fields private and adding getter methods:
- public final List<String> fieldsForKafkaKeyGen;
- public final List<String> nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay;
+ private final List<String> fieldsForKafkaKeyGen;
+ private final List<String> nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay;
+ public List<String> getFieldsForKafkaKeyGen() {
+ return Collections.unmodifiableList(fieldsForKafkaKeyGen);
+ }
+ public List<String> getNameFieldsForNotificationDisplay() {
+ return Collections.unmodifiableList(nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay);
+ }This change would improve encapsulation while still allowing read access to these fields.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public final List<String> fieldsForKafkaKeyGen; | |
| public final List<String> nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay; | |
| private final List<String> fieldsForKafkaKeyGen; | |
| private final List<String> nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay; | |
| public List<String> getFieldsForKafkaKeyGen() { | |
| return Collections.unmodifiableList(fieldsForKafkaKeyGen); | |
| } | |
| public List<String> getNameFieldsForNotificationDisplay() { | |
| return Collections.unmodifiableList(nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay); | |
| } |
MatthewErispe
merged commit 77380ae
into
CU-86c083kqv_Create-Config-Flag-for-Kafka-Key
MatthewErispe
deleted the
create-additional-config-for-notification-diplay-fields
branch
…e and kafka partition key
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
These changes aim to enhance the overall functionality and clarity of the application, benefiting user experience and system performance.