-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cu 86bzqwf6f deterministic only link rules fails to process all records #290
Cu 86bzqwf6f deterministic only link rules fails to process all records #290
Conversation
… and record fail on deterministic
…fails-to-process-all-records
WalkthroughThis update enhances functionalities across multiple components. Key changes include improved handling of null-related expressions in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant A as User
participant B as LinkerDWH
participant C as libMPI
participant D as Database
A->>B: Request to match records
B->>D: Check for existing matches
alt No matches
B->>C: Create golden record
alt Record creation success
C-->>B: Return linkInfo
B-->>A: Return linkInfo
else No record created
C-->>B: Return null
B-->>A: Return empty list
end
else Matches found
B-->>A: Return matches
end
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/linker/Programs.java (2 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Linker/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/linker/backend/LinkerDWH.java (1 hunks)
- devops/JeMPI_TestData/Reference/DataGenerator.py (3 hunks)
- devops/linux/docker/data-config/config.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- devops/linux/docker/data-config/config.json
Additional comments not posted (6)
devops/JeMPI_TestData/Reference/DataGenerator.py (3)
125-125
: LGTM! Verify the integration ofrec_start_num
.The changes to the construction of the
rec_num
variable are approved.However, ensure that the new
rec_start_num
is correctly integrated in the dataset generation logic.
138-139
: LGTM! Verify the integration of the shuffling operation.The changes to the final DataFrame creation are approved.
However, ensure that the shuffling operation is correctly integrated and does not introduce any issues in the dataset generation logic.
Verification successful
The integration of the shuffling operation using the
sample
method is correctly implemented.
- The
sample
method is used to shuffle the DataFrame as intended.- No other occurrences of the
sample
method were found in the file, indicating that the change is localized and does not introduce issues elsewhere.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the shuffling operation. # Test: Search for the usage of `sample` method. Expect: Correct integration in the DataFrame creation logic. rg --type python -A 5 $'sample'Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the shuffling operation. # Find all Python files and search for the usage of `sample` method within them. fd -e py -x rg 'sample' {}Length of output: 28
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the shuffling operation. # Search for the usage of `sample` method within the specific file. rg 'sample' devops/JeMPI_TestData/Reference/DataGenerator.pyLength of output: 110
11-15
: LGTM! Verify the integration of new parameters.The changes to the initial record start number and dataset generation parameters are approved.
However, ensure that the new parameters do not introduce any issues in the dataset generation logic.
Verification successful
The new parameters are correctly integrated into the dataset generation logic.
- The
NumberOfPatients
parameter is used to determine the number of iterations for generating patient data.- The
AverageNumberOfClinicalRecordsPerPatient
parameter is used in the clinical data generator function.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of new dataset generation parameters. # Test: Search for the usage of `NumberOfPatients` and `AverageNumberOfClinicalRecordsPerPatient`. Expect: Correct integration in the dataset generation logic. rg --type python -A 5 $'NumberOfPatients' rg --type python -A 5 $'AverageNumberOfClinicalRecordsPerPatient'Length of output: 167
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of new dataset generation parameters. # Test: Search for the usage of `NumberOfPatients` and `AverageNumberOfClinicalRecordsPerPatient`. Expect: Correct integration in the dataset generation logic. rg --type py -A 5 'NumberOfPatients' rg --type py -A 5 'AverageNumberOfClinicalRecordsPerPatient'Length of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of new dataset generation parameters. # Test: Search for variations and broader patterns related to `NumberOfPatients` and `AverageNumberOfClinicalRecordsPerPatient`. Expect: Correct integration in the dataset generation logic. rg --type py -A 5 'NumberOfPatients' rg --type py -A 5 'number_of_patients' rg --type py -A 5 'AverageNumberOfClinicalRecordsPerPatient' rg --type py -A 5 'average_number_of_clinical_records_per_patient'Length of output: 203
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Display the contents of the DataGenerator.py file for manual inspection. # Display the contents of the DataGenerator.py file cat devops/JeMPI_TestData/Reference/DataGenerator.pyLength of output: 9576
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Linker/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/linker/backend/LinkerDWH.java (1)
241-247
: LGTM! Verify the integration of the new logic.The changes to the
doMatch
method are approved.However, ensure that the new logic for handling link creation is correctly integrated and does not introduce any issues.
Verification successful
The integration of the new logic for handling link creation is correct.
The
doMatch
method is invoked appropriately within theLinkerDWH
class, ensuring that the new logic for creating a golden record is executed under the right conditions.
- The
doMatch
method is invoked when linking conditions are met, ensuring proper handling of the new logic.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the new logic for handling link creation. # Test: Search for the usage of `doMatch` method. Expect: Correct integration in the linking logic. rg --type java -A 5 $'doMatch'Length of output: 1734
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Gather more context around the invocation of the `doMatch` method to confirm the integration. # Test: Search for the invocation of `doMatch` method and include more context lines for better understanding. rg --type java -A 10 -B 10 $'doMatch'Length of output: 5775
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/linker/Programs.java (2)
416-417
: LGTM! Verify the integration of the new logic.The changes to the
generateDeterministicPrograms
method are approved.However, ensure that the new logic for handling null-related expressions is correctly integrated and does not introduce any issues.
133-143
: LGTM! Verify the integration of the new logic.The changes to the
postfixToInfix1
method are approved.However, ensure that the new logic for handling null-related expressions is correctly integrated and does not introduce any issues.
Verification successful
LGTM! The new logic for handling null-related expressions in
postfixToInfix1
is correctly integrated.The changes to the
postfixToInfix1
method are approved. The method is used in constructing queries, ensuring that the new null-handling logic is appropriately reflected in these queries.
- The
postfixToInfix1
method is correctly used in constructing queries.- The new logic for handling null-related expressions is properly integrated.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the new logic for handling null-related expressions. # Test: Search for the usage of `postfixToInfix1` method. Expect: Correct integration in the expression evaluation logic. rg --type java -A 5 $'postfixToInfix1'Length of output: 1757
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Gather more context around the usage of `postfixToInfix1` in Programs.java. # Search for the usage of `postfixToInfix1` and include more lines before and after the usage to understand the integration better. rg --type java -B 10 -A 10 $'postfixToInfix1'Length of output: 5515
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores