Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cu 86bzqwf6f deterministic only link rules fails to process all records #290

Conversation

MatthewErispe
Copy link
Collaborator

@MatthewErispe MatthewErispe commented Jul 29, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced handling of null-related expressions for improved robustness in evaluating postfix expressions.
    • Introduced logic for creating "golden records" when only deterministic linking rules are present, improving link creation functionality.
    • Expanded dataset generation capabilities, increasing the number of patients and clinical records, and improving randomness in output.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted logic in dataset generation and linking methods to handle specific scenarios more effectively.
  • Chores

    • Updated configuration filename for clarity without impacting functionality.

@rcrichton
Copy link
Member

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 29, 2024

Walkthrough

This update enhances functionalities across multiple components. Key changes include improved handling of null-related expressions in the postfixToInfix1 method, refined logic for link creation in the LinkerDWH class, expanded dataset generation parameters in DataGenerator.py, and a minor filename modification in the configuration file. Overall, these modifications aim to improve robustness, scalability, and clarity within the application.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/.../Programs.java Introduced handling for strings starting with "null(", consolidating existing "isNull" checks.
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Linker/src/main/java/.../LinkerDWH.java Modified doMatch to create golden records when no matches are found but deterministic rules exist.
devops/JeMPI_TestData/Reference/DataGenerator.py Updated dataset generation to start at record number 61000, increased patient and record counts, and added shuffling.
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config.json Changed filename from config-reference-link-dp.json to config-reference-link-d.json.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant A as User
    participant B as LinkerDWH
    participant C as libMPI
    participant D as Database

    A->>B: Request to match records
    B->>D: Check for existing matches
    alt No matches
        B->>C: Create golden record
        alt Record creation success
            C-->>B: Return linkInfo
            B-->>A: Return linkInfo
        else No record created
            C-->>B: Return null
            B-->>A: Return empty list
        end
    else Matches found
        B-->>A: Return matches
    end
Loading

Poem

🐰 In the garden where data grows,
Changes sprout like blooming rows.
With links and records, all in line,
A hop, a skip, the code’s divine!
So let us cheer, with joyful rhyme,
For progress made, it's testing time! 🌸


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ca5b193 and 9a9bff5.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/linker/Programs.java (2 hunks)
  • JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Linker/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/linker/backend/LinkerDWH.java (1 hunks)
  • devops/JeMPI_TestData/Reference/DataGenerator.py (3 hunks)
  • devops/linux/docker/data-config/config.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • devops/linux/docker/data-config/config.json
Additional comments not posted (6)
devops/JeMPI_TestData/Reference/DataGenerator.py (3)

125-125: LGTM! Verify the integration of rec_start_num.

The changes to the construction of the rec_num variable are approved.

However, ensure that the new rec_start_num is correctly integrated in the dataset generation logic.


138-139: LGTM! Verify the integration of the shuffling operation.

The changes to the final DataFrame creation are approved.

However, ensure that the shuffling operation is correctly integrated and does not introduce any issues in the dataset generation logic.

Verification successful

The integration of the shuffling operation using the sample method is correctly implemented.

  • The sample method is used to shuffle the DataFrame as intended.
  • No other occurrences of the sample method were found in the file, indicating that the change is localized and does not introduce issues elsewhere.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of the shuffling operation.

# Test: Search for the usage of `sample` method. Expect: Correct integration in the DataFrame creation logic.
rg --type python -A 5 $'sample'

Length of output: 61


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of the shuffling operation.

# Find all Python files and search for the usage of `sample` method within them.
fd -e py -x rg 'sample' {}

Length of output: 28


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of the shuffling operation.

# Search for the usage of `sample` method within the specific file.
rg 'sample' devops/JeMPI_TestData/Reference/DataGenerator.py

Length of output: 110


11-15: LGTM! Verify the integration of new parameters.

The changes to the initial record start number and dataset generation parameters are approved.

However, ensure that the new parameters do not introduce any issues in the dataset generation logic.

Verification successful

The new parameters are correctly integrated into the dataset generation logic.

  • The NumberOfPatients parameter is used to determine the number of iterations for generating patient data.
  • The AverageNumberOfClinicalRecordsPerPatient parameter is used in the clinical data generator function.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of new dataset generation parameters.

# Test: Search for the usage of `NumberOfPatients` and `AverageNumberOfClinicalRecordsPerPatient`. Expect: Correct integration in the dataset generation logic.
rg --type python -A 5 $'NumberOfPatients'
rg --type python -A 5 $'AverageNumberOfClinicalRecordsPerPatient'

Length of output: 167


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of new dataset generation parameters.

# Test: Search for the usage of `NumberOfPatients` and `AverageNumberOfClinicalRecordsPerPatient`. Expect: Correct integration in the dataset generation logic.
rg --type py -A 5 'NumberOfPatients'
rg --type py -A 5 'AverageNumberOfClinicalRecordsPerPatient'

Length of output: 97


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of new dataset generation parameters.

# Test: Search for variations and broader patterns related to `NumberOfPatients` and `AverageNumberOfClinicalRecordsPerPatient`. Expect: Correct integration in the dataset generation logic.
rg --type py -A 5 'NumberOfPatients'
rg --type py -A 5 'number_of_patients'
rg --type py -A 5 'AverageNumberOfClinicalRecordsPerPatient'
rg --type py -A 5 'average_number_of_clinical_records_per_patient'

Length of output: 203


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Display the contents of the DataGenerator.py file for manual inspection.

# Display the contents of the DataGenerator.py file
cat devops/JeMPI_TestData/Reference/DataGenerator.py

Length of output: 9576

JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Linker/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/linker/backend/LinkerDWH.java (1)

241-247: LGTM! Verify the integration of the new logic.

The changes to the doMatch method are approved.

However, ensure that the new logic for handling link creation is correctly integrated and does not introduce any issues.

Verification successful

The integration of the new logic for handling link creation is correct.

The doMatch method is invoked appropriately within the LinkerDWH class, ensuring that the new logic for creating a golden record is executed under the right conditions.

  • The doMatch method is invoked when linking conditions are met, ensuring proper handling of the new logic.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of the new logic for handling link creation.

# Test: Search for the usage of `doMatch` method. Expect: Correct integration in the linking logic.
rg --type java -A 5 $'doMatch'

Length of output: 1734


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Gather more context around the invocation of the `doMatch` method to confirm the integration.

# Test: Search for the invocation of `doMatch` method and include more context lines for better understanding.
rg --type java -A 10 -B 10 $'doMatch'

Length of output: 5775

JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/linker/Programs.java (2)

416-417: LGTM! Verify the integration of the new logic.

The changes to the generateDeterministicPrograms method are approved.

However, ensure that the new logic for handling null-related expressions is correctly integrated and does not introduce any issues.


133-143: LGTM! Verify the integration of the new logic.

The changes to the postfixToInfix1 method are approved.

However, ensure that the new logic for handling null-related expressions is correctly integrated and does not introduce any issues.

Verification successful

LGTM! The new logic for handling null-related expressions in postfixToInfix1 is correctly integrated.

The changes to the postfixToInfix1 method are approved. The method is used in constructing queries, ensuring that the new null-handling logic is appropriately reflected in these queries.

  • The postfixToInfix1 method is correctly used in constructing queries.
  • The new logic for handling null-related expressions is properly integrated.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of the new logic for handling null-related expressions.

# Test: Search for the usage of `postfixToInfix1` method. Expect: Correct integration in the expression evaluation logic.
rg --type java -A 5 $'postfixToInfix1'

Length of output: 1757


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Gather more context around the usage of `postfixToInfix1` in Programs.java.

# Search for the usage of `postfixToInfix1` and include more lines before and after the usage to understand the integration better.
rg --type java -B 10 -A 10 $'postfixToInfix1'

Length of output: 5515

Copy link
Collaborator

@sushantpatil1214 sushantpatil1214 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@sushantpatil1214 sushantpatil1214 merged commit 26c3d54 into dev Jul 29, 2024
5 checks passed
@sushantpatil1214 sushantpatil1214 deleted the CU-86bzqwf6f_Deterministic-Only-Link-Rules---fails-to-process-all-records branch July 29, 2024 13:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants