Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf: input #2978

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: feat_v3.x
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

oasis-cloud
Copy link
Collaborator

@oasis-cloud oasis-cloud commented Feb 10, 2025

🤔 这个变动的性质是?

  • 新特性提交
  • 日常 bug 修复
  • 站点、文档改进
  • 演示代码改进
  • 组件样式/交互改进
  • TypeScript 定义更新
  • 包体积优化
  • 性能优化
  • 功能增强
  • 国际化改进
  • 重构
  • 代码风格优化
  • 测试用例
  • 分支合并
  • 其他改动(是关于什么的改动?)

🔗 相关 Issue

💡 需求背景和解决方案

☑️ 请求合并前的自查清单

⚠️ 请自检并全部勾选全部选项⚠️

  • 文档已补充或无须补充
  • 代码演示已提供或无须提供
  • TypeScript 定义已补充或无须补充
  • fork仓库代码是否为最新避免文件冲突
  • Files changed 没有 package.json lock 等无关文件

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 重构

    • 优化了输入组件的事件处理和交互逻辑,提升了系统响应的一致性与稳定性。
  • 样式更新

    • 更新了文本对齐逻辑,使输入内容在不同布局下显示更加清晰和协调。

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Walkthrough

本次 PR 修改了两个 Input 组件文件。在 src/.../input.taro.tsx 中,添加了 BaseEventOrig 导入,简化了 updateValue 函数逻辑,并调整了 handleInput 事件处理方式,同时将内联样式替换为调用 getTextAlign 函数。在 src/.../input.tsx 中,对导入顺序进行整理,更新了事件及接口类型,重命名并简化了多个函数(如 updateValue → handleValueUpdate、inputClass → getInputClass、inputType → getInputType、handleInput → handleInputChange),并优化了 useImperativeHandle 的实现和清除图标的渲染逻辑。

Changes

文件 变更概要
src/.../input.taro.tsx - 添加 BaseEventOrig 导入
- 简化 updateValue 函数逻辑,直接调用 eventHandler
- 修改 handleInput 接收 BaseEventOrig,提取事件值
- 使用 getTextAlign 函数计算样式
src/.../input.tsx - 重新排序并补充导入(MouseEvent、useRef)
- 更新 InputProps 接口(formatter 返回类型、onClick 参数类型)
- 重命名并简化函数逻辑(如 updateValue、inputClass、inputType、handleInput)
- 简化 useImperativeHandle 和清除图标渲染
- 添加 getTextAlign 函数

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as 用户
    participant IC as Input组件
    participant EH as 事件处理器
    U->>IC: 触发输入事件
    IC->>IC: 提取事件值 (detail/currentTarget)
    alt 非 onChange 触发
        IC->>EH: 调用事件处理器 (eventHandler?.(val))
    end
    EH-->>IC: 返回处理结果
    IC->>IC: 更新组件状态
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

嗨,我是一只跳跃的小兔子,
见证代码轻盈的转变,
输入组件焕然一新,
函数名字舞动新节拍,
事件流畅如春风拂面 🐇🌸!
代码的花园中,我快乐徜徉。


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a9a6292 and de41f1d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/packages/input/input.taro.tsx (5 hunks)
  • src/packages/input/input.tsx (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/packages/input/input.tsx

[warning] 119-120: src/packages/input/input.tsx#L119-L120
Added lines #L119 - L120 were not covered by tests


[warning] 224-224: src/packages/input/input.tsx#L224
Added line #L224 was not covered by tests

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/packages/input/input.tsx (5)

3-7: 类型定义的改进值得称赞!

类型定义的更新提高了代码的类型安全性和可读性:

  • formatter 返回类型更改为 string 更准确地反映了其功能
  • 事件处理函数参数命名更清晰

Also applies to: 37-42


114-121: 建议增加对 useImperativeHandle 的测试覆盖

虽然实现逻辑清晰简洁,但静态分析显示这部分代码缺少测试覆盖。建议添加相关测试用例,特别是对 nativeElement getter 的测试。

需要我帮您生成测试用例吗?

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 119-120: src/packages/input/input.tsx#L119-L120
Added lines #L119 - L120 were not covered by tests


135-154: 值处理逻辑优化得当!

  • 函数重命名提高了代码可读性
  • 参数类型更精确
  • 逻辑流程更清晰

176-182: 建议添加 RTL 场景的测试

新增的 getTextAlign 函数很好地处理了 RTL 布局,但建议添加相关测试用例以确保在不同语言环境下的正确性。

需要我帮您编写 RTL 相关的测试用例吗?


218-230: 建议增加清除功能的测试覆盖

清除功能的实现逻辑已优化,但静态分析显示缺少测试覆盖。建议添加以下场景的测试:

  • 清除图标的显示/隐藏逻辑
  • 清除操作的回调函数调用

需要我帮您编写相关测试用例吗?

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 224-224: src/packages/input/input.tsx#L224
Added line #L224 was not covered by tests

src/packages/input/input.taro.tsx (3)

17-17: 事件类型处理改进合理!

  • 使用 BaseEventOrig 类型提高了类型安全性
  • 事件处理逻辑更符合 Taro 平台特性

Also applies to: 180-182


157-165: 值更新逻辑优化得当!

  • 代码结构更清晰
  • 保持了与 Web 版本的一致性
  • 同时维护了 Taro 平台特性

198-204: 建议进行跨平台测试

getTextAlign 函数的实现与 Web 版本保持一致,但建议:

  1. 确保在不同平台(Web、小程序等)上的表现一致
  2. 验证 RTL 布局在各平台的正确性

需要我帮您设计跨平台测试方案吗?

Also applies to: 218-218


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added action:review This PR needs more reviews (less than 2 approvals) 3.x Target branch 3.x labels Feb 10, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.82759% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 85.76%. Comparing base (a9a6292) to head (de41f1d).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/packages/input/input.tsx 94.82% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           feat_v3.x    #2978      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      85.74%   85.76%   +0.02%     
=============================================
  Files            277      277              
  Lines          18105    18069      -36     
  Branches        2745     2738       -7     
=============================================
- Hits           15524    15497      -27     
+ Misses          2576     2567       -9     
  Partials           5        5              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3.x Target branch 3.x action:review This PR needs more reviews (less than 2 approvals) size/L
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant