Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: local cannot run problem #2857

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

irisSong
Copy link
Collaborator

@irisSong irisSong commented Dec 12, 2024

🤔 这个变动的性质是?

  • 新特性提交
  • 日常 bug 修复
  • 站点、文档改进
  • 演示代码改进
  • 组件样式/交互改进
  • TypeScript 定义更新
  • 包体积优化
  • 性能优化
  • 功能增强
  • 国际化改进
  • 重构
  • 代码风格优化
  • 测试用例
  • 分支合并
  • 其他改动(是关于什么的改动?)

🔗 相关 Issue

💡 需求背景和解决方案

☑️ 请求合并前的自查清单

⚠️ 请自检并全部勾选全部选项⚠️

  • 文档已补充或无须补充
  • 代码演示已提供或无须提供
  • TypeScript 定义已补充或无须补充
  • fork仓库代码是否为最新避免文件冲突
  • Files changed 没有 package.json lock 等无关文件

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 功能更新
    • 更新了组件筛选逻辑,以更精确地决定哪些组件应包含在配置中。

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Walkthrough

该变更主要修改了 scripts/rn/update-taro-entry.js 中的逻辑,以决定一个组件是否应包含在 adaptedArray 中。具体而言,更新了检查组件是否特殊的条件,要求 param 变量存在。此外,createConfig 函数中的逻辑也进行了相应调整,以确保组件的处理依赖于 param 的存在。整体控制流程保持不变,但组件处理的条件得到了细化。

Changes

文件路径 变更摘要
scripts/rn/update-taro-entry.js 修改了组件包含在 adaptedArray 中的条件,增加了对 param 变量的检查;调整了 createConfig 函数中的逻辑以反映相似条件。

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

3.x

Suggested reviewers

  • oasis-cloud
  • Alex-huxiyang

Poem

在月光下,兔子跳跃,
组件筛选,逻辑更新,
param 变量,带来新意,
适应数组,愉快无比!
兔子欢呼,代码更美,
让我们一起,继续前行! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the 3.x Target branch 3.x label Dec 12, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.56%. Comparing base (cb2bf37) to head (01c6dac).
Report is 3 commits behind head on feat_v3.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           feat_v3.x    #2857   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage      84.56%   84.56%           
==========================================
  Files            273      273           
  Lines          18609    18609           
  Branches        2693     2693           
==========================================
  Hits           15737    15737           
  Misses          2867     2867           
  Partials           5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
scripts/rn/update-taro-entry.js (3)

Line range hint 47-51: 建议优化配置生成逻辑

当前的配置生成逻辑可以进行以下优化:

  1. 参数验证需要更严格
  2. 条件判断可以简化

建议重构为:

-          if (!param || specialComponent(it.name)) {
+          const shouldInclude = !param || (typeof param === 'string' && param.trim() && specialComponent(it.name));
+          if (shouldInclude) {
             co.pages.push(`pages/${it.name.toLowerCase()}/index`)
           }

Line range hint 108-122: 建议使用现代异步处理方式

当前的文件系统操作使用回调方式,建议改用 async/await 语法以提高代码可读性和维护性。同时建议加强错误处理机制。

建议重构为:

-  fse.access(componentBaseUrl, fse.constants.F_OK, (err) => {
-    if (err) {
-      // 文件夹不存在,创建文件夹
-      fse.mkdir(componentBaseUrl, { recursive: true }, (err) => {
-        if (err) throw err
-        console.log('文件夹创建成功!')
-        updatePages(componentBaseUrl, item)
-      })
-    } else {
-      updatePages(componentBaseUrl, item)
-    }
-  })
+  try {
+    await fse.access(componentBaseUrl, fse.constants.F_OK)
+  } catch (err) {
+    // 文件夹不存在,创建文件夹
+    await fse.mkdir(componentBaseUrl, { recursive: true })
+    console.log('文件夹创建成功!')
+  }
+  await updatePages(componentBaseUrl, item)

同时建议将 updatePages 函数也改为异步方式:

- const updatePages = (componentBaseUrl, item) => {
+ const updatePages = async (componentBaseUrl, item) => {
-   fse.writeFileSync(
+   await fse.writeFile(
      `${componentBaseUrl}/index.tsx`,
      `import Demo from '@/packages/${item.lowercaseName}/demo.taro';\nexport default Demo;`
    )
-   fse.writeFileSync(
+   await fse.writeFile(
      `${componentBaseUrl}/index.config.ts`,
      `export default {\n  navigationBarTitleText: '${item.name}',\n}`
    )
  }

Line range hint 1-122: 建议进行整体架构优化

当前文件存在以下需要改进的地方:

  1. 缺少统一的错误处理机制
  2. 配置处理逻辑可以抽离为独立模块
  3. 缺少日志记录机制

建议:

  1. 添加统一的错误处理中间件
  2. 将配置生成逻辑抽离为单独的模块
  3. 引入日志系统记录关键操作
  4. 添加配置验证机制

需要确认是否需要我协助实现这些改进?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fe50c4b and 01c6dac.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • scripts/rn/update-taro-entry.js (1 hunks)

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ config.nav.map((item) => {
item.packages.forEach((element) => {
const { name, version } = element
if (version !== '3.0.0') return // 未适配不导出
if (specialComponent(name)) return
if (param && specialComponent(name)) return
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

需要对 param 进行空值保护

specialComponent 函数中直接使用 param.split() 会在 paramundefined 时抛出错误。根据代码注释和使用场景,process.env.C 是一个可选参数,用于指定需要处理的组件列表。

建议修改为:

-    if (param && specialComponent(name)) return
+    if (!param) return false
+    if (specialComponent(name)) return true
  • 在 scripts/rn/update-taro-entry.js 中添加对 param 的空值判断
  • 确保在未指定组件列表时的默认行为符合预期
🔗 Analysis chain

条件判断需要更严谨的处理

当前的条件判断 param && specialComponent(name) 可能会在 param 未定义时导致组件选择不符合预期。建议添加更明确的参数验证。

建议修改为:

-    if (param && specialComponent(name)) return
+    if (typeof param === 'string' && param.trim() && specialComponent(name)) return

执行以下脚本验证组件筛选逻辑:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 验证组件筛选逻辑的使用场景
rg -A 3 "process.env.C" .

Length of output: 312


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 检查 specialComponent 函数的实现
ast-grep --pattern 'function specialComponent($_) { $$$ }'

# 检查 param 的使用场景
rg -B 2 -A 5 "const param = process.env.C" .

Length of output: 1001

Copy link
Collaborator

@Alex-huxiyang Alex-huxiyang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

上一个PR处理这个了 #2856

@irisSong irisSong closed this Dec 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3.x Target branch 3.x size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants