-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 269
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: local cannot run problem #2857
Conversation
Walkthrough该变更主要修改了 Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## feat_v3.x #2857 +/- ##
==========================================
Coverage 84.56% 84.56%
==========================================
Files 273 273
Lines 18609 18609
Branches 2693 2693
==========================================
Hits 15737 15737
Misses 2867 2867
Partials 5 5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
scripts/rn/update-taro-entry.js (3)
Line range hint
47-51
: 建议优化配置生成逻辑当前的配置生成逻辑可以进行以下优化:
- 参数验证需要更严格
- 条件判断可以简化
建议重构为:
- if (!param || specialComponent(it.name)) { + const shouldInclude = !param || (typeof param === 'string' && param.trim() && specialComponent(it.name)); + if (shouldInclude) { co.pages.push(`pages/${it.name.toLowerCase()}/index`) }
Line range hint
108-122
: 建议使用现代异步处理方式当前的文件系统操作使用回调方式,建议改用 async/await 语法以提高代码可读性和维护性。同时建议加强错误处理机制。
建议重构为:
- fse.access(componentBaseUrl, fse.constants.F_OK, (err) => { - if (err) { - // 文件夹不存在,创建文件夹 - fse.mkdir(componentBaseUrl, { recursive: true }, (err) => { - if (err) throw err - console.log('文件夹创建成功!') - updatePages(componentBaseUrl, item) - }) - } else { - updatePages(componentBaseUrl, item) - } - }) + try { + await fse.access(componentBaseUrl, fse.constants.F_OK) + } catch (err) { + // 文件夹不存在,创建文件夹 + await fse.mkdir(componentBaseUrl, { recursive: true }) + console.log('文件夹创建成功!') + } + await updatePages(componentBaseUrl, item)同时建议将
updatePages
函数也改为异步方式:- const updatePages = (componentBaseUrl, item) => { + const updatePages = async (componentBaseUrl, item) => { - fse.writeFileSync( + await fse.writeFile( `${componentBaseUrl}/index.tsx`, `import Demo from '@/packages/${item.lowercaseName}/demo.taro';\nexport default Demo;` ) - fse.writeFileSync( + await fse.writeFile( `${componentBaseUrl}/index.config.ts`, `export default {\n navigationBarTitleText: '${item.name}',\n}` ) }
Line range hint
1-122
: 建议进行整体架构优化当前文件存在以下需要改进的地方:
- 缺少统一的错误处理机制
- 配置处理逻辑可以抽离为独立模块
- 缺少日志记录机制
建议:
- 添加统一的错误处理中间件
- 将配置生成逻辑抽离为单独的模块
- 引入日志系统记录关键操作
- 添加配置验证机制
需要确认是否需要我协助实现这些改进?
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ config.nav.map((item) => { | |||
item.packages.forEach((element) => { | |||
const { name, version } = element | |||
if (version !== '3.0.0') return // 未适配不导出 | |||
if (specialComponent(name)) return | |||
if (param && specialComponent(name)) return |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
需要对 param 进行空值保护
在 specialComponent
函数中直接使用 param.split()
会在 param
为 undefined
时抛出错误。根据代码注释和使用场景,process.env.C
是一个可选参数,用于指定需要处理的组件列表。
建议修改为:
- if (param && specialComponent(name)) return
+ if (!param) return false
+ if (specialComponent(name)) return true
- 在 scripts/rn/update-taro-entry.js 中添加对
param
的空值判断 - 确保在未指定组件列表时的默认行为符合预期
🔗 Analysis chain
条件判断需要更严谨的处理
当前的条件判断 param && specialComponent(name)
可能会在 param
未定义时导致组件选择不符合预期。建议添加更明确的参数验证。
建议修改为:
- if (param && specialComponent(name)) return
+ if (typeof param === 'string' && param.trim() && specialComponent(name)) return
执行以下脚本验证组件筛选逻辑:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 验证组件筛选逻辑的使用场景
rg -A 3 "process.env.C" .
Length of output: 312
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查 specialComponent 函数的实现
ast-grep --pattern 'function specialComponent($_) { $$$ }'
# 检查 param 的使用场景
rg -B 2 -A 5 "const param = process.env.C" .
Length of output: 1001
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
上一个PR处理这个了 #2856
🤔 这个变动的性质是?
🔗 相关 Issue
💡 需求背景和解决方案
☑️ 请求合并前的自查清单
Summary by CodeRabbit