More flexible member concatenation #277
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jbusecke
force-pushed
the
bugfix_member_id_promote
branch
from
6b52afe to
03d49e9
Compare
|
Leaving the doc issue to #276 |
jbusecke
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Recent changes in intake-esm already created a 'member_id' dimension on datasets. This PR makes the xmip equivalent process more flexible (allowing to work with both intake-esm and raw zarr stores) and also fully conforms with the official reconstruction method (see under "File name template:") including accounting for
sub_experiment_id(only relevant for DCPP experiments I believe).