Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[feature] multi-node types #121

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 15, 2020
Merged

[feature] multi-node types #121

merged 5 commits into from
Feb 15, 2020

Conversation

jbolda
Copy link
Owner

@jbolda jbolda commented Nov 26, 2019

This feature branch is for upcoming v2.1.0. It will be not be squashed so PRs to this branch will follow through to master.

Known items to complete:

  • rough implementation
  • pass existing tests
  • add new example to test against (should fail if this new feature breaks / isn't enabled)
  • update documentation

/cc @ndrabins @jamessimone

kevee and others added 3 commits November 25, 2019 22:48
* Option to make tables separate node types

* Revert "Option to make tables separate node types"

This reverts commit b59ffda.

* Removed package/lock from branch

* Added AirtableField node types.

* Added more info for createSeparateNodeType

* Version bump

* Check that separateNodeType option exists
* separateMapTypes config option

* update version
@jbolda
Copy link
Owner Author

jbolda commented Dec 14, 2019

@ndrabins, still interested in helping out with this PR?

* prettier all the things

* add separateNodeType option

* spelling mistake

* add separateNodeType

* add example that errors without new features

* bump version number
@jbolda
Copy link
Owner Author

jbolda commented Feb 15, 2020

I believe this is feature complete. This is published as gatsby-source-airtable@2.1.0-beta.0 until it gets pushed to stable.

@jbolda jbolda merged commit 7c186a6 into master Feb 15, 2020
@jbolda jbolda deleted the feature/multi-node-types branch February 15, 2020 20:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants