Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[tracegen] Switch from Jaeger Client to OTEL SDK #4189

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2023

Conversation

yurishkuro
Copy link
Member

@yurishkuro yurishkuro commented Jan 29, 2023

Which problem is this PR solving?

  • Part of migrating away from deprecated Jaeger Go SDK

Short description of the changes

  • switch tracegen from Jaeger Client to OTEL SDK

Breaking change

  • default exporter changed from UDP to HTTP
  • different environment variables are used to configure exporters
  • debug and firehose flags are no longer set in the trace context, but as span attributes
  • no more metrics from tracegen

Signed-off-by: Yuri Shkuro <github@ysh.us>
@yurishkuro yurishkuro added the changelog:breaking-change Change that is breaking public APIs or established behavior label Jan 29, 2023
@yurishkuro yurishkuro requested a review from a team as a code owner January 29, 2023 19:44
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 29, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 97.10% // Head: 97.09% // Decreases project coverage by -0.01% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (70dc374) compared to base (fb1d67f).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4189      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.10%   97.09%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         301      301              
  Lines       17674    17674              
==========================================
- Hits        17162    17161       -1     
- Misses        412      413       +1     
  Partials      100      100              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 97.09% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
plugin/storage/integration/integration.go 75.95% <0.00%> (-0.39%) ⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@yurishkuro yurishkuro merged commit 74d6a12 into jaegertracing:main Jan 29, 2023
@yurishkuro yurishkuro deleted the tracegen-to-otel branch January 29, 2023 20:16
shubbham1215 pushed a commit to shubbham1215/jaeger that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2023
## Which problem is this PR solving?
- Part of migrating away from deprecated Jaeger Go SDK

## Short description of the changes
- switch tracegen from Jaeger Client to OTEL SDK
- a breaking change in some respect:
  - default exporter changed to Jaeger HTTP
  - different environment variables are used to configure exporters
- debug and firehose flags are no longer set in the trace context, but
as span attributes
  - no more metrics from tracegen

Signed-off-by: Yuri Shkuro <github@ysh.us>
shubbham1215 pushed a commit to shubbham1215/jaeger that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2023
## Which problem is this PR solving?
- Part of migrating away from deprecated Jaeger Go SDK

## Short description of the changes
- switch tracegen from Jaeger Client to OTEL SDK
- a breaking change in some respect:
  - default exporter changed to Jaeger HTTP
  - different environment variables are used to configure exporters
- debug and firehose flags are no longer set in the trace context, but
as span attributes
  - no more metrics from tracegen

Signed-off-by: Yuri Shkuro <github@ysh.us>
Signed-off-by: shubbham1215 <sawaikershubham@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog:breaking-change Change that is breaking public APIs or established behavior
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant