Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add documentation how the current badger storage is modeled #1859

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2019

Conversation

burmanm
Copy link
Contributor

@burmanm burmanm commented Oct 14, 2019

Which problem is this PR solving?

  • Describe how the current data modeling is designed in the badger implementation.

@objectiser

Signed-off-by: Michael Burman <yak@iki.fi>
@jpkrohling
Copy link
Contributor

I wonder if it wouldn't make more sense to have storage-specific pages in the main documentation. We do have quite a few details worth documenting for each one of them.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 14, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1859 into master will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #1859      +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage   98.44%   98.4%   -0.05%     
=========================================
  Files         197     197              
  Lines        9631    9631              
=========================================
- Hits         9481    9477       -4     
- Misses        114     117       +3     
- Partials       36      37       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
cmd/query/app/static_handler.go 83.33% <0%> (-3.51%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ab11c69...337d35b. Read the comment docs.

@objectiser
Copy link
Contributor

@jpkrohling The aim here is to provide some design docs to help with maintaining the code. So not sure relevant for the user docs, but did you have a different place in mind?

@objectiser objectiser merged commit cf15cf0 into jaegertracing:master Oct 14, 2019
radekg pushed a commit to Klarrio/jaeger that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2019
…acing#1859)

Signed-off-by: Michael Burman <yak@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: radekg <radek@gruchalski.com>
backjo pushed a commit to backjo/jaeger that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2019
…acing#1859)

Signed-off-by: Michael Burman <yak@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonah Back <jonah@jonahback.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants