Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle grantSession keys as available parameter #11

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

sammdec
Copy link

@sammdec sammdec commented Dec 17, 2024

Adds functionality to now handle provided keys to the grantSession action and adds them as available keys within Porto.

Alos updates the contracts to include ecdsa signature validation

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 17, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 7c3e0c9

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 17, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
oddworld-playground ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 18, 2024 5:33am
porto-wagmi ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 18, 2024 5:33am

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 17, 2024

@sammdec is attempting to deploy a commit to the Ithaca Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

}

/** Gets a Secp256k1Key in the required type **/
export function getSecp256k1Key(
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tmm Could this and getCryptoWebKey be grouped as they are the same apart from the type so the return type would just need to change based on that value

@jxom
Copy link
Member

jxom commented Jan 8, 2025

This will be superseded by #16.

@jxom jxom closed this Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants