Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PID/(Q)EAA Data Model - PID Claims] missing element #261

Closed
pietroACN opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #305
Closed

[PID/(Q)EAA Data Model - PID Claims] missing element #261

pietroACN opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #305
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Something improving existing features issuance
Milestone

Comments

@pietroACN
Copy link

Within PID claims, Link we need to add a reference to the Schema used by the PID.

@peppelinux
Copy link
Member

peppelinux commented May 2, 2024

I agree that a ref to ARF where the PID data set schema is provided would make sense

@peppelinux peppelinux added enhancement Something improving existing features issuance labels May 2, 2024
@peppelinux peppelinux added this to the 0.8.0 milestone May 13, 2024
cmarco0 added a commit to cmarco0/eudi-wallet-it-docs-fork that referenced this issue Jun 4, 2024
this commit aims to resolve issue italia#261 and italia#262
@peppelinux peppelinux linked a pull request Jun 12, 2024 that will close this issue
@peppelinux peppelinux modified the milestones: 0.8.0, 0.8.1 Jun 12, 2024
peppelinux pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2024
* Added ARF reference in PID claim

this commit aims to resolve issue #261 and #262

* editorial update

Co-authored-by: Giuseppe De Marco <giuseppe.demarco@teamdigitale.governo.it>

* Apply suggestions from code review

---------

Co-authored-by: Giuseppe De Marco <giuseppe.demarco@teamdigitale.governo.it>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Something improving existing features issuance
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants