feat(web): Stepper - Ignore information steps when displaying history #16514
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/components/Stepper/Stepper/Stepper.tsx (1)
Line range hint
309-313: LGTM: Improved error handling, with suggestions for enhancementThis change effectively prevents transitions when no valid selection is made, enhancing the form's robustness. It aligns well with best practices for form validation.
Suggestions for further improvement:
- Consider adding an aria-live region to announce the error state for better accessibility.
- You might want to display a visual error message near the options to provide immediate feedback to the user.
Would you like assistance in implementing these suggestions?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/web/components/Stepper/Stepper/Stepper.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/web/components/Stepper/Stepper/Stepper.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/web/components/Stepper/Stepper/Stepper.tsx (1)
Line range hint
109-113: LGTM: Change aligns with PR objectiveThis modification successfully implements the PR's goal of ignoring information steps when displaying history. It enhances the user experience by reducing clutter in the history display, showing only relevant question-answer pairs.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16514 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 36.76% 36.76%
=======================================
Files 6847 6847
Lines 141884 141884
Branches 40429 40429
=======================================
Hits 52167 52167
Misses 89717 89717
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 16 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 15 Passed Test ServicesThis report shows up to 10 services
|
…-steps-in-history
kodiakhq
bot
deleted the
feature/web-stepper-stop-showing-information-steps-in-history
branch
Stepper - Ignore information steps when displaying history
Screenshots / Gifs
Before
After
No more "Halda áfram" spam
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes