-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: checkbox width bug #16467
fix: checkbox width bug #16467
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16467 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.78% 36.73% -0.05%
==========================================
Files 6833 6835 +2
Lines 141423 141276 -147
Branches 40278 40202 -76
==========================================
- Hits 52016 51901 -115
+ Misses 89407 89375 -32
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 30 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/CheckboxFormField/CheckboxFormField.tsx (2)
23-28
: Approve the removal of FC, but consider explicit return typeThe removal of the
FC
type annotation aligns with modern React practices. However, to maintain strong typing, consider adding an explicit return type to the function.Consider updating the function declaration as follows:
export const CheckboxFormField = ({ error, showFieldName = false, field, application, }: Props): JSX.Element => { // ... rest of the function }This change will ensure that the return type is explicitly defined, improving type safety and readability.
Add tests for
CheckboxFormField
to ensure proper renderingThe current test coverage includes
CheckboxController
, but there are no tests forCheckboxFormField
. To verify that the removal of thesplit
prop resolves the checkbox width issue without introducing new problems, please add comprehensive tests forCheckboxFormField
.
- Ensure that the checkbox renders with the correct width.
- Verify that all functionalities of
CheckboxFormField
remain intact after removing thesplit
prop.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
67-96
: Verify checkbox width rendering and add testsThe removal of the
split
prop fromCheckboxController
appears to be related to the checkbox width bug mentioned in the PR objectives. While this change might resolve the issue, it's crucial to ensure that it doesn't introduce new problems.Please verify that:
- The checkbox width now renders correctly as 'half' instead of one-quarter of the intended size.
- This change doesn't negatively impact other use cases of the
CheckboxController
.To prevent future regressions, I recommend adding tests for this functionality. Would you like assistance in creating these tests?
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for existing tests related to CheckboxFormField and CheckboxController # Test: Look for existing test files echo "Searching for existing test files:" fd -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx --exec echo {} # Test: Search for mentions of CheckboxFormField in test files echo "\nSearching for CheckboxFormField in test files:" rg --type typescript "CheckboxFormField" -g "*test.tsx" -g "*spec.tsx" # Test: Search for mentions of CheckboxController in test files echo "\nSearching for CheckboxController in test files:" rg --type typescript "CheckboxController" -g "*test.tsx" -g "*spec.tsx"Length of output: 5765
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for mentions of CheckboxFormField and CheckboxController in test files without using --type # Test: Search for mentions of CheckboxFormField in test files echo "Searching for CheckboxFormField in test files:" rg "CheckboxFormField" -g "*test.tsx" -g "*spec.tsx" # Test: Search for mentions of CheckboxController in test files echo "\nSearching for CheckboxController in test files:" rg "CheckboxController" -g "*test.tsx" -g "*spec.tsx"Length of output: 1253
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/CheckboxFormField/CheckboxFormField.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/CheckboxFormField/CheckboxFormField.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/CheckboxFormField/CheckboxFormField.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-96
: Code adheres to provided guidelinesThe
CheckboxFormField
component follows the coding guidelines for files in thelibs
directory:
- It appears to be reusable across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript is used effectively for defining props and types.
- The code structure supports effective tree-shaking and bundling.
Great job on maintaining code quality and following the established guidelines!
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/CheckboxFormField/CheckboxFormField.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 5 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 5 Passed Test Services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NVM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
What
Fix bug that makes
width: 'half'
render as 1/4Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
CheckboxFormField
component for better performance and flexibility in rendering.Bug Fixes
split
prop from theCheckboxController
, streamlining checkbox rendering.