Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(j-s): Filter Case Files by Police Case Number #16422

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

gudjong
Copy link
Member

@gudjong gudjong commented Oct 16, 2024

Filter Case Files by Police Case Number

Allar skrár fara í allar skjalaskrár

What

  • Filters case files by police case number before adding passing them to the case files record UI.

Why

  • Verified bug.

Screenshots / Gifs

Before

image

After

image

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Improved organization and handling of case files within the CaseFile component, enhancing data representation.
    • Introduced a more structured approach to filtering case files based on policeCaseNumber and category.

@gudjong gudjong requested a review from a team as a code owner October 16, 2024 11:40
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The CaseFile component in CaseFile.tsx has been significantly restructured to enhance its logic for managing case files. The previous filtering method has been replaced with a Map that links each policeCaseNumber to its relevant case files, improving data organization. The filtering now considers both the policeCaseNumber and the category. Additionally, the dependencies for the useMemo hook have been updated, and the caseFiles prop for IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem has been adjusted to source filtered case files from the Map.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx Refactored case file handling logic to use a Map for associating policeCaseNumber with filtered case files, updated useMemo dependencies, and modified caseFiles prop for IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem.

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.73%. Comparing base (cc988c7) to head (c5bfdf4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...outes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16422   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.73%   36.73%           
=======================================
  Files        6809     6809           
  Lines      141138   141110   -28     
  Branches    40233    40226    -7     
=======================================
- Hits        51840    51831    -9     
+ Misses      89298    89279   -19     
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.37% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 41.41% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 27.88% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
application-ui-shell 21.35% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-web 27.92% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...outes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 9 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cc988c7...c5bfdf4. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs 6590f32 🔗

6 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 6 Passed
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 11 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.77s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 120 2 2m 58.7s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 123 0 2m 28.58s 1 no change Link
application-ui-shell 0 0 0 74 0 35.89s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-web 0 0 0 338 0 1m 20.39s 1 no change Link
web 0 0 0 84 0 31s 1 no change Link

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously requested changes Oct 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d3ccc15 and 780d6ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx (1)
Learnt from: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#14673
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Tables/CasesForReview.tsx:79-79
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:08.299Z
Learning: The implementation of `mapIndictmentCaseStateToTagVariant` in `TagCaseState.tsx`, which maps only `CaseState.ACCEPTED` to a specific tag and defaults others to an "unknown" status, is intentional as per the application's requirements.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx (1)

81-81: ⚠️ Potential issue

Avoid using array index as key in list rendering

Using index as a key can lead to unexpected behavior if the list items change order or if items are added or removed. It's safer to use a unique identifier like policeCaseNumber as the key.

Apply this diff to fix the key usage:

- key={index}
+ key={policeCaseNumber}

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

@oddsson oddsson added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Oct 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx (1)

31-41: Excellent refactoring of caseFiles logic with room for type safety improvement.

The changes to the caseFiles useMemo hook significantly improve data organization and filtering:

  1. Using a Map for caseFiles improves data structure and access efficiency.
  2. The updated filtering logic correctly addresses the PR objective of filtering case files by police case number.
  3. The dependencies array now correctly includes workingCase.policeCaseNumbers.

These changes align with React best practices for efficient state management.

However, to further enhance type safety, consider adding an explicit type annotation for the Map:

const caseFiles = useMemo<Map<string, TCaseFile[]>>(() => {
  // ... existing code ...
}, [workingCase.caseFiles, workingCase.policeCaseNumbers])

This will provide better type inference and catch potential type-related issues earlier.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 780d6ce and d5e8c52.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/CaseFile/CaseFile.tsx (2)

19-22: LGTM: Improved type imports enhance code clarity and safety.

The changes to the import statements are well-considered:

  1. Importing CaseFile as TCaseFile improves type safety and avoids naming conflicts.
  2. Separate import of CaseFileCategory follows best practices for granular imports.

These changes align with TypeScript best practices and improve code readability.


84-84: LGTM: Proper usage of the new caseFiles Map structure.

The change to the caseFiles prop in IndictmentsCaseFilesAccordionItem is well-implemented:

  1. It correctly uses the get method on the caseFiles Map to retrieve files for each police case number.
  2. The fallback to an empty array (?? []) prevents potential runtime errors if no case files are found.

This implementation aligns perfectly with the PR objective of filtering case files by police case number and follows React best practices for prop passing.

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit be38ab0 into main Oct 16, 2024
41 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the j-s/fix-case-files-record-memo branch October 16, 2024 13:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants