feat(signature-collection): Admin lock signature list endpoint #16250
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new mutation method Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.service.ts (2)
216-224: LGTM: NewlockListmethod implemented correctly.The
lockListmethod is well-implemented, following the existing patterns in the class. It properly uses TypeScript for parameter and return type definitions, and correctly delegates the locking operation to thesignatureCollectionClientService.Consider adding error handling to catch and properly handle any exceptions that might be thrown by the
signatureCollectionClientService.lockListcall. This would improve the robustness of the method. For example:async lockList( input: SignatureCollectionListIdInput, user: User, ): Promise<SignatureCollectionSuccess> { try { return await this.signatureCollectionClientService.lockList( user, input.listId, ) } catch (error) { // Log the error or handle it appropriately throw new Error(`Failed to lock list: ${error.message}`); } }
Line range hint
1-224: Summary: NewlockListfunctionality added successfully.The changes in this file successfully implement the new admin lock signature list endpoint. The additions are well-integrated with the existing code, following established patterns and TypeScript best practices. The new functionality enhances the
SignatureCollectionAdminServiceclass, allowing for locking of signature collection lists.To further improve the modularity and reusability of this service:
- Consider extracting the lock functionality into a separate, focused service if it grows in complexity or if similar operations are needed elsewhere.
- Ensure that the
SignatureCollectionSuccesstype is well-defined and reusable across different parts of the application.libs/clients/signature-collection/src/lib/signature-collection-admin.service.ts (1)
355-367: LGTM with suggestions for improvementThe
lockListmethod is well-implemented and follows the established patterns in the class. It correctly uses TypeScript for type definitions and handles potential errors appropriately. However, consider the following suggestions to enhance reusability and maintainability:
- Extract the API call logic into a separate private method to improve reusability and make the code more DRY.
- Consider using a constant or enum for the success property name (
listaLokad) to avoid magic strings.Here's a suggested refactoring:
private async callAdminApi<T>( method: (params: any) => Promise<T>, params: any ): Promise<T> { try { return await method(params); } catch { throw new Error('API call failed'); } } async lockList(auth: Auth, listId: string): Promise<Success> { try { const res = await this.callAdminApi( (params) => this.getApiWithAuth(this.adminApi, auth).adminMedmaelalistiIDLockListPatch(params), { iD: parseInt(listId, 10) } ); return { success: res.listaLokad ?? false }; } catch { return { success: false }; } }This refactoring improves reusability by extracting the API call logic and error handling into a separate method, which can be used by other methods in the class.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.resolver.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.service.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/clients/signature-collection/src/lib/signature-collection-admin.service.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.resolver.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/clients/signature-collection/src/lib/signature-collection-admin.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.service.ts (1)
25-28: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The addition of
SignatureCollectionListIdInputto the import statement is consistent with its usage in the newlockListmethod and follows the existing import structure.
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.resolver.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16250 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 36.92% 36.93%
=======================================
Files 6781 6781
Lines 140009 139983 -26
Branches 39810 39799 -11
=======================================
- Hits 51703 51698 -5
+ Misses 88306 88285 -21
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 4 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 4 Passed Test Services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (2) |
|
This PR currently has a merge conflict. Please resolve this and then re-add the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/clients/signature-collection/src/lib/signature-collection-admin.service.ts (1)
378-390: Enhance error handling and add documentationThe
lockListmethod is well-structured and follows TypeScript best practices. However, consider the following improvements:
Enhance error handling:
- Log the error or provide more specific error information.
- Consider returning different error codes or messages for different types of errors.
Add documentation:
- Include a JSDoc comment explaining the purpose of the method, its parameters, and return value.
- Describe any side effects or important behaviors of the method.
Here's an example of how you could improve the method:
/** * Locks a signature collection list. * @param auth - The authentication object. * @param listId - The ID of the list to lock. * @returns A Promise resolving to a Success object indicating whether the operation was successful. */ async lockList(auth: Auth, listId: string): Promise<Success> { try { const res = await this.getApiWithAuth( this.adminApi, auth ).adminMedmaelalistiIDLockListPatch({ iD: parseInt(listId, 10), }); return { success: res.listaLokad ?? false }; } catch (error) { console.error(`Failed to lock list ${listId}:`, error); return { success: false, error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error' }; } }This improvement enhances error handling and adds documentation, making the code more maintainable and easier to understand for other developers.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.resolver.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.service.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/clients/signature-collection/src/lib/signature-collection-admin.service.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.resolver.ts
- libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollectionAdmin.service.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/clients/signature-collection/src/lib/signature-collection-admin.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
...
Attach a link to issue if relevant
What
Specify what you're trying to achieve
Why
Specify why you need to achieve this
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes