feat(auth-api-lib): Use db to look up delegation types and providers when validating #16116
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes consist of updates to the delegation handling within the codebase, including the addition of a constant array for delegation providers, a new function for creating delegation providers and types, and modifications to validation logic. The validation method has been refactored to improve clarity, and a new enumeration value for delegation types has been introduced. Overall, these changes enhance the structure and maintainability of the delegation-related functionality. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- apps/services/auth/delegation-api/src/app/delegations/test/delegation-index/delegation-index.controller.spec.ts (7 hunks)
- libs/auth-api-lib/src/lib/delegations/delegations-index.service.ts (5 hunks)
- libs/auth-api-lib/src/lib/delegations/utils/delegations.ts (0 hunks)
- libs/shared/types/src/lib/delegation.ts (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- libs/auth-api-lib/src/lib/delegations/utils/delegations.ts
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (3)
apps/services/auth/delegation-api/src/app/delegations/test/delegation-index/delegation-index.controller.spec.ts (2)
Pattern
apps/services/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NestJS architecture, including modules, services, and controllers.
- Dependency injection patterns and service encapsulation.
- Integration and unit testing coverage and practices."
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/auth-api-lib/src/lib/delegations/delegations-index.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/shared/types/src/lib/delegation.ts (2)
Pattern
libs/shared/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Cross-application utility functions, types, and constants.
- TypeScript best practices to ensure type safety and reusability.
- Documentation and examples for library consumers."
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Additional comments not posted (6)
apps/services/auth/delegation-api/src/app/delegations/test/delegation-index/delegation-index.controller.spec.ts (2)
10-14: LGTM: New imports and DELEGATION_PROVIDERS constantThe addition of new imports (DelegationProviderModel, DelegationTypeModel) and the DELEGATION_PROVIDERS constant improves the structure and maintainability of the test file. The constant provides a centralized definition of delegation providers and their types, which can be easily updated if needed.
Also applies to: 77-94
Line range hint
95-476: LGTM with suggestion: Impact on existing testsThe changes to the test setup enhance the test environment by providing necessary data without altering the existing test logic. This is a good approach to extending the test coverage.
However, given the new models and data setup, it might be beneficial to:
- Verify if any new tests are needed to cover scenarios related to the newly added delegation providers and types.
- Ensure that the existing tests still cover all relevant scenarios with the new setup.
To assist with this verification, you could run the following script:
This script will help identify which delegation providers and types are currently covered in the tests, allowing you to spot any gaps in test coverage.
libs/auth-api-lib/src/lib/delegations/delegations-index.service.ts (4)
31-31: Import statement is appropriate.The import of
DelegationTypeModelis correctly added and necessary for the new validation logic.
135-136: Injection ofDelegationTypeModelis correctly implemented.The
DelegationTypeModelis properly injected into the service using@InjectModel, enabling database interactions.
666-687: Validation method updated correctly with appropriate exception handling.The
validateCrudParamsfunction is properly updated to be asynchronous, and the inclusion of validation checks enhances data integrity. Exception messages are clear and informative, aiding in debugging and user feedback.
266-266: Ensure all calls tovalidateCrudParamsare correctly awaited.Since
validateCrudParamsis now anasyncfunction, it's important toawaitits execution to handle validations properly. Verify that all other calls tovalidateCrudParamswithin the codebase are updated to useawait.Run the following script to find all usages of
validateCrudParams:This script searches for any calls to
validateCrudParamsnot preceded byawait.Also applies to: 277-277
Verification successful
All calls to
validateCrudParamsare correctly awaited.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all calls to validateCrudParams to ensure they are awaited. # Test: Search for validateCrudParams usage. Expect: All calls should be preceded by 'await'. rg --type ts --pcre2 '(?<!await\s+)this\.validateCrudParams\(' -A 0 -B 2Length of output: 159
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all calls to validateCrudParams to ensure they are awaited. # Test: Search for validateCrudParams usage. Expect: All calls should be preceded by 'await'. rg --type ts --pcre2 '(?<!await )this\.validateCrudParams\(' -A 0 -B 2Length of output: 72
libs/auth-api-lib/src/lib/delegations/delegations-index.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/services/auth/delegation-api/src/app/delegations/test/delegation-index/delegation-index.controller.spec.ts (1)
10-14: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments for DELEGATION_PROVIDERSThe new imports and the DELEGATION_PROVIDERS constant align well with the PR objective of using the database for delegation types and providers lookup. This enhances the test setup by providing a clear definition of the available providers and types.
Consider adding JSDoc comments to the DELEGATION_PROVIDERS constant to improve code documentation:
/** * Defines the available delegation providers and their corresponding types. * Used for setting up test data in the database. */ const DELEGATION_PROVIDERS = [ // ... existing array content ];Also applies to: 77-94
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/services/auth/delegation-api/src/app/delegations/test/delegation-index/delegation-index.controller.spec.ts (7 hunks)
- libs/auth-api-lib/src/lib/delegations/delegations-index.service.ts (5 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
apps/services/auth/delegation-api/src/app/delegations/test/delegation-index/delegation-index.controller.spec.ts (2)
Pattern
apps/services/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NestJS architecture, including modules, services, and controllers.
- Dependency injection patterns and service encapsulation.
- Integration and unit testing coverage and practices."
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/auth-api-lib/src/lib/delegations/delegations-index.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Additional comments not posted (6)
apps/services/auth/delegation-api/src/app/delegations/test/delegation-index/delegation-index.controller.spec.ts (2)
452-464: LGTM! Well-structured setup functionThe
setupDelegationModelsfunction is a well-implemented encapsulation of the setup logic for delegation models. It follows NestJS patterns for dependency injection and effectively serves its purpose in the test setup.This function will help reduce duplication in the test suites and improve maintainability.
Line range hint
1-490: Overall LGTM: Changes align well with PR objectiveThe modifications to this test file effectively incorporate the new database-driven approach for delegation types and providers lookup, aligning well with the PR objective. The changes include:
- New imports for database models
- A constant defining delegation providers and types
- Updated test setup to initialize the necessary models
- New helper functions for setting up delegation models and creating test data
The changes maintain the existing test structure while enhancing it to work with the new database lookup functionality. The code follows NestJS testing practices and patterns, ensuring consistency with the project's architecture.
To further improve the code:
- Consider adding JSDoc comments to the DELEGATION_PROVIDERS constant
- Implement the suggested refactoring to reduce duplication in test setup
- Add error handling to the createDelegationProvidersAndTypes function
These enhancements will improve code documentation, maintainability, and robustness.
libs/auth-api-lib/src/lib/delegations/delegations-index.service.ts (4)
31-31: LGTM: Import added for new validation logicThe addition of the
DelegationTypeModelimport is appropriate for the new validation logic being introduced. This change adheres to the TypeScript usage guideline for importing types.
135-136: LGTM: Constructor updated for new validation logicThe addition of
DelegationTypeModelto the constructor is consistent with the new validation logic and follows the existing dependency injection pattern. This change supports the reusability aspect mentioned in the coding guidelines.
266-266: LGTM: Async validation properly handledThe
awaitkeyword has been correctly added to thevalidateCrudParamscall, ensuring that the validation is completed before proceeding with the upsert operation. This change improves error handling and maintains the logical flow of the method.
277-277: LGTM: Async validation properly handledThe
awaitkeyword has been correctly added to thevalidateCrudParamscall in theremoveDelegationRecordmethod, ensuring that the validation is completed before proceeding with the delete operation. This change is consistent with the update increateOrUpdateDelegationRecordand improves error handling.
...delegation-api/src/app/delegations/test/delegation-index/delegation-index.controller.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...delegation-api/src/app/delegations/test/delegation-index/delegation-index.controller.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
This PR currently has a merge conflict. Please resolve this and then re-add the |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16116 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.75% 36.72% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 6835 6835
Lines 141330 141336 +6
Branches 40238 40239 +1
==========================================
- Hits 51949 51904 -45
- Misses 89381 89432 +51 Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ❌ 81 Total Test Services: 1 Failed, 77 Passed Test ServicesThis report shows up to 10 services
❌ Failed Tests (1)
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (3) |
What
☝️
Why
Specify why you need to achieve this
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
PersonalRepresentativePostbox.