Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(driving-license): disabled BE for 65 and older #15873

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 4, 2024
Merged

fix(driving-license): disabled BE for 65 and older #15873

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 4, 2024

Conversation

albinagu
Copy link
Member

@albinagu albinagu commented Sep 3, 2024

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated eligibility criteria for the application process, now disabling the application section for users aged 65 and older, in addition to those under 18 or lacking required license categories.

@albinagu albinagu requested a review from a team as a code owner September 3, 2024 16:44
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The change introduces an additional condition to the sectionApplicationFor function that disables the application section for users aged 65 and older. This modification expands the eligibility criteria, making it more restrictive by preventing individuals in this age group from proceeding with the application, alongside those under 18 or lacking the necessary license categories.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
libs/application/templates/driving-license/src/forms/prerequisites/sectionApplicationFor.ts Added a condition to the disabled property to include users aged 65 and older in the eligibility check.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Application
    User->>Application: Initiate application
    Application->>User: Check age and license categories
    alt Age < 18 or Age >= 65 or License not valid
        Application-->>User: Disable application
    else Age >= 18 and Age < 65 and License valid
        Application-->>User: Allow application
    end
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@albinagu albinagu added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Sep 3, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.94%. Comparing base (b69edd2) to head (473a602).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...e/src/forms/prerequisites/sectionApplicationFor.ts 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #15873   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.93%   36.94%           
=======================================
  Files        6681     6681           
  Lines      136456   136439   -17     
  Branches    38746    38738    -8     
=======================================
  Hits        50401    50401           
+ Misses      86055    86038   -17     
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.39% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 41.75% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 23.64% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
application-templates-driving-license 15.97% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
application-ui-shell 21.17% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...e/src/forms/prerequisites/sectionApplicationFor.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8fa9622...473a602. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 464249e and f653826.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • libs/application/templates/driving-license/src/forms/prerequisites/sectionApplicationFor.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/templates/driving-license/src/forms/prerequisites/sectionApplicationFor.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Additional comments not posted (2)
libs/application/templates/driving-license/src/forms/prerequisites/sectionApplicationFor.ts (2)

87-87: LGTM!

The code change is approved.


Line range hint 1-1: Adheres to the additional instructions for files in the libs directory.

The file:

  • Exports a reusable sectionApplicationFor function that can be used across different driving license application forms.
  • Uses TypeScript for defining the DrivingLicense and DrivingLicenseFakeData types and exporting the sectionApplicationFor function.
  • Imports only the necessary dependencies, which helps with effective tree-shaking and bundling.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

Datadog Report

All test runs 864f1f6 🔗

5 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 5 Passed
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 8 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.81s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 111 2 3m 5.95s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 109 0 1m 47.24s 1 no change Link
application-templates-driving-license 0 0 0 13 0 16.31s 1 no change Link
application-ui-shell 0 0 0 74 0 33.72s 1 no change Link

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit b8c0447 into main Sep 4, 2024
36 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the be_65 branch September 4, 2024 10:05
jonnigs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2024
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants