Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ServiceX Exploratory Notebook #4

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Mar 31, 2024
Merged

ServiceX Exploratory Notebook #4

merged 9 commits into from
Mar 31, 2024

Conversation

gordonwatts
Copy link
Member

@gordonwatts gordonwatts commented Mar 29, 2024

  • Add a simple SX spreadsheet that shows how we will access SX - the straight forward way.
  • Update README's for the SX and the direct uproot version

The next step for SX is to automate the code (which will make it less readable) for doing similar branches that are done for the uproot version..

Fixes #3

@gordonwatts gordonwatts changed the title Basic readme updates ServiceX Exploratory Notebook Mar 30, 2024
Copy link
Member

@alexander-held alexander-held left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some very minor comments, happy to get this merged.

The next step for SX is to automate the code (which will make it less readable) for doing similar branches that are done for the uproot version..

We'll certainly have to think of a good way to handle all this. The PHYSLITE schema introduces similar challenges where jet kinematics are living in the Jets object, e.g. Jets.eta, but the raw branch names in uproot are e.g. "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.eta". We'll have to freeze branch names at some point for efficient XCache use but some initial room for freedom and experimentation would be useful.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
servicex/00 -exploring-the-data.ipynb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member Author

@gordonwatts gordonwatts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The filename has a whitespace which I imagine is unintentional?

Yes - that was an error, thanks for the catch!

@gordonwatts gordonwatts self-assigned this Mar 31, 2024
@gordonwatts gordonwatts added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 31, 2024
@gordonwatts gordonwatts marked this pull request as ready for review March 31, 2024 20:35
@gordonwatts gordonwatts merged commit 49c6a55 into main Mar 31, 2024
@gordonwatts gordonwatts deleted the pr_sx branch March 31, 2024 20:35
gordonwatts added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2024
* Use `uproot.dask` directly to open up files rather than letting the automaticed process take care of it. This fixed the bug.
* Remove the awkward array restriction
* Update documentation to note the removal of the limitation
gordonwatts added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2024
* Use `uproot.dask` directly to open up files rather than letting the automaticed process take care of it. This fixed the bug.
* Remove the awkward array restriction
* Update documentation to note the removal of the limitation
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Create a ServiceX script/notebook version
2 participants