-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ServiceX Exploratory Notebook #4
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some very minor comments, happy to get this merged.
The next step for SX is to automate the code (which will make it less readable) for doing similar branches that are done for the uproot version..
We'll certainly have to think of a good way to handle all this. The PHYSLITE schema introduces similar challenges where jet kinematics are living in the Jets
object, e.g. Jets.eta
, but the raw branch names in uproot
are e.g. "AnalysisJetsAuxDyn.eta"
. We'll have to freeze branch names at some point for efficient XCache use but some initial room for freedom and experimentation would be useful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The filename has a whitespace which I imagine is unintentional?
Yes - that was an error, thanks for the catch!
* Use `uproot.dask` directly to open up files rather than letting the automaticed process take care of it. This fixed the bug. * Remove the awkward array restriction * Update documentation to note the removal of the limitation
uproot
versionThe next step for SX is to automate the code (which will make it less readable) for doing similar branches that are done for the
uproot
version..Fixes #3