-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
introduce LinkSystem #143
Merged
Merged
introduce LinkSystem #143
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a1482fe
Introduce LinkSystem.
warpfork 8fef531
Extract multi{codec,hash} registries better.
warpfork 45b8e9c
Update go-multihash; this upstreams much of the streaming hash work.
warpfork 08f13e5
LinkSystem: detect direct byte access features on readers and attempt…
warpfork 8fcc676
Multicodec registry now guarded by functions.
warpfork 705307f
Merge branch 'master' into linksystem
warpfork 8a7497f
fix(codec/raw): update for linksystem
hannahhoward 6386588
Update some comments regarding multihash.
warpfork d9d5682
Better document why some of the branches around direct byte slice acc…
warpfork 8ef5eab
Update changelog.
warpfork File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can this not be inferred from the type?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
{
not(
:) it's an adapter type, not an interface cast.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think i was wanting the apparently deprecated '-1' to indicate default length because a lot of these hashes have a single length that makes sense, and i don't want to be remembering / fumble that sha1 should be 20 bytes while sha224 should be 28 bytes every time i make one of these.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh, sorry, I thought the comment was on the diff line, since that's what github highlighted most brightly.
Yeah, agree. I wish the go-cid and/or go-multihash libraries were more friendly about this very common user story.
I think a -1 should flow through and do whatever go-multihash does, still. And I have no idea why that's deprecated, fwiw. (A lot of things in go-multihash seem deprecated without much comment on why or what to do instead. I think some review and renovation of that is overdue.)
It's slightly on the other side of where I'm cordoning my renovation today, though.