Do not merge - protocol change discussion #1333
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There was doublewrapping with an unneeded msgio. given that we use a stream muxer now, msgio is only needed by secureConn -- to signal the boundaries of an encrypted / mac-ed ciphertext. Side note: i think including the varint length in the clear is actually a bad idea that can be exploited by an attacker. it should be encrypted, too. (TODO)
|
cc @jbenet |
| return err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return s.buf.Flush() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ok if the flush happens here that's fine (maybe make a note that the flush must be there or else the write wont write-through to the underlying transport?)
|
i think this is fine as long that msgio flush happens there |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This branch contains the code from #1065 as well as the change from #1304. without this change, the times for an ipfs ping were at least double that of a unix ping, with these changes, they are quite close.