This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 23, 2023. It is now read-only.
fix: handle concurrent writes on windows #28
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Windows can return EPERM errors when trying to rename temp files to files that already exist. In our case a file with a given name will always have the same content so if it's created while we are trying to also create it, we can reasonably assume it's ok to use. If we want to be more thorough we could hash the contents of the new file.
achingbrain
force-pushed
the
support-concurrent-writes-on-windows
branch
from
ba30134
to
d5c8e4f
Compare
hugomrdias
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2019
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Windows can return EPERM errors when trying to rename temp files to files that already exist. In our case a file with a given name will always have the same content so if it's created while we are trying to also create it, we can reasonably assume it's ok to use.
If we want to be more thorough we could hash the contents of the new file.