-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove global variable #12
Conversation
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
} | ||
|
||
var linkSystemBase ipld.LinkSystem | ||
func NewDecoder() *Decoder { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rvagg @willscott WDYT about having this take a linksystem (or at least the relevant parts for building a linksystem like the decoder and reifier) instead of being stuck with the go-ipld-prime default registry? Could be a functional option if you'd prefer NewDecoder()
to continue to work.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a different linksystem you need for functionality beyond the transformations exposed by the codec registry here?
would a Decoder.SetLinkSystem(ls)
method work?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well it's not just the transformations it's also the passthrough for non-transformed codecs to the go-ipld-prime defaults. I'd like to control those instead of being reliant on whatever gets autoloaded by some package I imported.
Sure a setter would work too. It seems mostly like a stylistic choice compared to a constructor argument so 🤷♀️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
adding a method isn't a breaking interface change, so would be v0.2.1 - i guess it doesn't matter too much :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is a pretty direct refactor to allow multiple instances of decoder to be present at once