This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 23, 2020. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 370
Feature: Allow users to tinker with RocksDB configuration via file; Upgrade RocksDb #1638
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
aa1f0f6
Updated rocksdb to 6.2.2
0e0b227
Updated deprecated methods
dce9ef6
Changed closing order for columnfamily
43d8465
Added configurable config
bf19eaa
config null check
fff6e60
Merge branch 'dev' into rocksdb-config
edbc8fa
rocksdb peristanceprovider javadoc
2853325
Extracted options file creation
2095d03
Merge branch 'dev' into rocksdb-config
40ced48
Merge branch 'dev' into rocksdb-config
6df88b4
Merge branch 'rocksdb-config' of https://github.com/kwek20/iri into r…
77354a6
Merge branch 'dev' into rocksdb-config
0bf94dd
Merge branch 'dev' into rocksdb-config
0c7cf30
Merge branch 'dev' into rocksdb-config
cd10e84
try/catch and javadoc fix
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So mainnet-db and spent-addresses-db uses the same name?
IIUC it is just the name but there are still separate locations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea same config. i dont really think there will be added value of splitting the 2 apart, unless we hire a rocksdb expert who can tinker enough to make a difference. But assuming we will work on a new persistence layer anyways, i doubt it will happen soon :)