-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
74360c9
commit 3c0cfdd
Showing
1 changed file
with
4 additions
and
4 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ Pod::Spec.new do |s| | |
s.authors = 'Invertase Limited' | ||
s.pod_target_xcconfig = { 'OTHER_LDFLAGS' => '-lObjC' } | ||
s.static_framework = true | ||
s.user_target_xcconfig = { 'EXCLUDED_ARCHS[sdk=iphonesimulator*]' => 'arm64' } | ||
s.pod_target_xcconfig = { 'EXCLUDED_ARCHS[sdk=iphonesimulator*]' => 'arm64' } | ||
s.user_target_xcconfig = { 'EXCLUDED_ARCHS[sdk=iphonesimulator*]' => 'i386' } | ||
s.pod_target_xcconfig = { 'EXCLUDED_ARCHS[sdk=iphonesimulator*]' => 'i386' } | ||
# s.user_target_xcconfig = { 'EXCLUDED_ARCHS[sdk=iphonesimulator*]' => 'arm64' } | ||
# s.pod_target_xcconfig = { 'EXCLUDED_ARCHS[sdk=iphonesimulator*]' => 'arm64' } | ||
# s.user_target_xcconfig = { 'EXCLUDED_ARCHS[sdk=iphonesimulator*]' => 'i386' } | ||
# s.pod_target_xcconfig = { 'EXCLUDED_ARCHS[sdk=iphonesimulator*]' => 'i386' } | ||
This comment has been minimized.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment has been minimized.
Sorry, something went wrong.
russellwheatley
Author
Member
|
||
# These frameworks, minimums, and the c++ library are here from, and copied specifically to match, the upstream podspec: | ||
# https://github.com/firebase/firebase-ios-sdk/blob/34c4bdbce23f5c6e739bda83b71ba592d6400cd5/FirebaseFirestore.podspec#L103 | ||
# They may need updating periodically. | ||
|
Hey @russellwheatley - looking at frameworks stuff I see your branch here with these changes, were these necessary for you? Should I consider testing them? now that I consider them, they look a little suspicious either way - why are we setting the same variable twice (stated differently: is the second set of each variable not clobbering the first set ?)