Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: improve template related type compatibility #449

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Nov 10, 2020

Conversation

SGrueber
Copy link
Collaborator

@SGrueber SGrueber commented Oct 30, 2020

PR Type

[x] Refactoring (no functional changes, no API changes)

What Is the New Behavior?

Template related type compability has been improved.

Does this PR Introduce a Breaking Change?

[ ] Yes
[x] No

Other Information

@SGrueber SGrueber requested a review from dhhyi October 30, 2020 11:20
@SGrueber SGrueber force-pushed the refactor/strict_templates_1 branch from 37129d3 to e595d05 Compare November 2, 2020 08:32
@dhhyi dhhyi force-pushed the refactor/strict_templates_1 branch 4 times, most recently from f61f070 to 313e5c1 Compare November 6, 2020 11:20
@dhhyi dhhyi force-pushed the refactor/strict_templates_1 branch from 81b15c8 to 68031a5 Compare November 6, 2020 20:48
@dhhyi dhhyi self-assigned this Nov 8, 2020
@dhhyi dhhyi added the refactoring Refactoring of current code label Nov 8, 2020
@dhhyi dhhyi added this to the 0.26 milestone Nov 8, 2020
@dhhyi dhhyi force-pushed the refactor/strict_templates_1 branch 3 times, most recently from a9c829e to 3002e21 Compare November 9, 2020 14:27
@dhhyi dhhyi force-pushed the refactor/strict_templates_1 branch from 3002e21 to 4861060 Compare November 9, 2020 15:09
@dhhyi dhhyi merged commit 55a5755 into develop Nov 10, 2020
@dhhyi dhhyi deleted the refactor/strict_templates_1 branch November 10, 2020 08:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
refactoring Refactoring of current code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants